Abstract
This chapter looks critically at a particular type of experimental evolution, often called laboratory natural selection (LNS). In this protocol, stocks of organisms are reared chronically under different conditions and allowed to evolve by natural selection over many generations. The chapter discusses the difficulties of balancing simplicity and realism in laboratory studies of natural selection, especially when they are intended to simulate selection in the wild. Because LNS experiments have strengths and weaknesses, researchers contemplating one face the classic catch-22 (or double-bind) situation. They may well decide that LNS is the best way to test a given evolutionary hypothesis, but simultaneously they must accept that some of the inferences they draw from their LNS experiment may be of uncertain validity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Experimental Evolution |
| Subtitle of host publication | Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments |
| Editors | Theodore Garland, Michael R Rose |
| Publisher | University of California Press |
| Chapter | 22 |
| Pages | 670-701 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780520944473 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780520247666 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 3 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Laboratory evolution meets catch-22: Balancing simplicity and realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver