Large herbivores in a partially migratory population search for the ideal free home

Hans W. Martin, Mark Hebblewhite, Evelyn H. Merrill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Migration is a tactic used across taxa to access resources in temporally heterogenous landscapes. Populations that migrate can attain higher abundances because such movements allow access to higher quality resources, or reduction in predation risk resulting in increased fitness. However, most migratory species occur in partially migratory populations, a mix of migratory and non-migratory individuals. It is thought that the portion of migrants in a partial migration population is maintained either through (1) a population-level evolutionary stable state where counteracting density-dependent vital rates act on migrants and residents to balance fitness or (2) conditional migration, where the propensity to migrate is influenced by the individual's state. However, in many respects, migration is also a form of habitat selection and the proportion of migrants and residents may be the result of density-dependent habitat selection. Here, we test whether the theory of Ideal Free Distribution (IFD) can explain the coexistence of different migratory tactics in a partially migratory population. IFD predicts individuals exhibit density-dependent vital rates and select different migratory tactics to maximize individual fitness resulting in equal fitness (λ) between tactics. We tested the predictions of IFD in a partially migratory elk population that declined by 70% with 19 years of demographic data and migratory tactic switching rates from >300 individuals. We found evidence of density dependence for resident pregnancy and adult female survival providing a fitness incentive to switch tactics. Despite differences in vital rates between migratory tactics, mean λ (fitness) was equal. However, as predicted by the IFD, individuals switched tactics toward those of higher fitness. Our analysis reveals that partial migration may be driven by tactic selection that follows the ideal free distribution. These findings reinforce that migration across taxa may be a polymorphic behavior in large herbivores where migratory tactic selection is determined by differential costs and benefits, mediated by density dependence.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere3652
JournalEcology
Volume103
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Funding

Statement of authorship: Mark Hebblewhite and Evelyn H. Merrill designed and implemented the long-term research study and all authors collected data. Hans Martin conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, which was revised by all authors. Support for our long-term data collection was provided by collaborators T. Shury, B. MacBeth, J. Whittington, B. Fyten, B. Hunt, A. Hubbs, R. Corrigan, C. White, T. Hurd, J. Berg, H. Bohm, S. Eggeman, J. Normandeau, and C. Sutheimer. We thank J. Millspaugh, M. Mitchell, P. Lukacs, J. Nowak, M. Kauffman, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on previous drafts of this manuscript. Funding for this long-term study was provided by dozens of funding agencies including, but not limited to, National Science Foundation (DEB LTREB grant 1556248 & 2038704), National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Parks Canada, Alberta Environment and Parks, Alberta Conservation Association, Alberta Fish & Game Association - Minister's Special License Program, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Safari Club International Foundation, Safari Club International Hunter Legacy 100 Endowment, Shikar Safari Club, Northern Alberta Chapter of Safari Club International, National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA), the University of Alberta, and the University of Montana. Animal handling was approved through University of Montana IACUC protocol: 059-08MHECS-120908, Parks Canada Research Permit YHTR-2017-26977, Alberta Research and Collection permits #20-004 and #20-00. Statement of authorship: Mark Hebblewhite and Evelyn H. Merrill designed and implemented the long‐term research study and all authors collected data. Hans Martin conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, which was revised by all authors. Support for our long‐term data collection was provided by collaborators T. Shury, B. MacBeth, J. Whittington, B. Fyten, B. Hunt, A. Hubbs, R. Corrigan, C. White, T. Hurd, J. Berg, H. Bohm, S. Eggeman, J. Normandeau, and C. Sutheimer. We thank J. Millspaugh, M. Mitchell, P. Lukacs, J. Nowak, M. Kauffman, and two anonymous reviewers for comments on previous drafts of this manuscript. Funding for this long‐term study was provided by dozens of funding agencies including, but not limited to, National Science Foundation (DEB LTREB grant 1556248 & 2038704), National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Parks Canada, Alberta Environment and Parks, Alberta Conservation Association, Alberta Fish & Game Association ‐ Minister's Special License Program, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Safari Club International Foundation, Safari Club International Hunter Legacy 100 Endowment, Shikar Safari Club, Northern Alberta Chapter of Safari Club International, National Aeronautics and Space Agency (NASA), the University of Alberta, and the University of Montana. Animal handling was approved through University of Montana IACUC protocol: 059‐08MHECS‐120908, Parks Canada Research Permit YHTR‐2017‐26977, Alberta Research and Collection permits #20‐004 and #20‐00. Alberta Conservation Association, Grant/Award Numbers: 363302, 363387, 363466, 363526; Alberta Fish and Game Association, Grant/Award Numbers: AFGA MSL 2016 AE‐01, MSL 2018 AE‐02, MSL 2019 AE‐02; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Montana Institute of Ecosystems, Grant/Award Number: Supported by the National Science Foundation EPSCo; National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: DEB LTREB Grant 1556248; Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Grant/Award Number: Project #NA180292; Safari Club International Foundation, Grant/Award Number: Hunter Legacy Fund Funding information

FundersFunder number
AFGA MSL 2016 AE‐01, MSL 2018 AE‐02
20-004, YHTR-2017-26977
2038704, 1556248
Alberta Conservation Association363526, 363387, 363466, 363302
059-08MHECS-120908
180292
University of Alberta

    Keywords

    • Cervus canadensis
    • behavioral polymorphism
    • ideal free distribution
    • migratory switching
    • partial migration

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Large herbivores in a partially migratory population search for the ideal free home'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this