Abstract
I modify the skewed lottery task introduced by Grossman and Eckel (Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51(3), 2015) to eliminate the effects of loss aversion as a potentially confounding explanation for the strong preference for skewed lotteries and increase in risk taking that they observe when skew increases. I also test for framing effects by reversing the order of the task. Like previous studies, a majority of subjects prefer skewed lotteries relative to those with no skew, but this preference is dampened when loss aversion is eliminated as a confound and the order of the task is reverse. More importantly, introducing skew is unlikely to cause an increase in risk taking in this task.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 245-261 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Journal of Risk and Uncertainty |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- Framing effects
- Order effect
- Position effect
- Risk aversion
- Skewness