Abstract
Aim: Phenological mismatches, when life-events become mistimed with optimal environmental conditions, have become increasingly common under climate change. Population-level susceptibility to mismatches depends on how phenology and phenotypic plasticity vary across a species’ distributional range. Here, we quantify the environmental drivers of colour moult phenology, phenotypic plasticity, and the extent of phenological mismatch in seasonal camouflage to assess vulnerability to mismatch in a common North American mammal. Location: North America. Time period: 2010–2017. Major taxa studied: Snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus). Methods: We used > 5,500 by-catch photographs of snowshoe hares from 448 remote camera trap sites at three independent study areas. To quantify moult phenology and phenotypic plasticity, we used multinomial logistic regression models that incorporated geospatial and high-resolution climate data. We estimated occurrence of camouflage mismatch between hares’ coat colour and the presence and absence of snow over 7 years of monitoring. Results: Spatial and temporal variation in moult phenology depended on local climate conditions more so than on latitude. First, hares in colder, snowier areas moulted earlier in the fall and later in the spring. Next, hares exhibited phenotypic plasticity in moult phenology in response to annual variation in temperature and snow duration, especially in the spring. Finally, the occurrence of camouflage mismatch varied in space and time; white hares on dark, snowless background occurred primarily during low-snow years in regions characterized by shallow, short-lasting snowpack. Main conclusions: Long-term climate and annual variation in snow and temperature determine coat colour moult phenology in snowshoe hares. In most areas, climate change leads to shorter snow seasons, but the occurrence of camouflage mismatch varies across the species’ range. Our results underscore the population-specific susceptibility to climate change-induced stressors and the necessity to understand this variation to prioritize the populations most vulnerable under global environmental change.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 503-515 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Global Ecology and Biogeography |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2020 |
Funding
We are grateful to the many field technicians and volunteers who managed the remote camera sites and photographs. Next, we thank Sean T. Giery, Zac A. Cheviron and two anonymous referees for their comments on earlier drafts. This work was supported by the Department of the Interior Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center Global Change Fellowship through Cooperative Agreement No. G10AC00624 to MZ; Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, T‐2‐3R grant for Nongame Species Monitoring and Management through the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, and a E‐1‐25 grant for Investigations and Population Recovery through the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department to APKS; Colorado Species Conservation Trust Fund; the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology Grant 0841884 and 1907022 to LSM; the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Award No. 1736249 (OIA‐1736249); North Carolina State University; and the University of Montana. Parks Canada funded data collection in Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. We are grateful to the many field technicians and volunteers who managed the remote camera sites and photographs. Next, we thank Sean T. Giery, Zac A. Cheviron and two anonymous referees for their comments on earlier drafts. This work was supported by the Department of the Interior Southeast Climate Adaptation Science Center Global Change Fellowship through Cooperative Agreement No. G10AC00624 to MZ; Department of the Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, T-2-3R grant for Nongame Species Monitoring and Management through the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, and a E-1-25 grant for Investigations and Population Recovery through the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department to APKS; Colorado Species Conservation Trust Fund;?the National Science Foundation Division of Environmental Biology Grant 0841884 and 1907022?to LSM; the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Award No. 1736249?(OIA-1736249); North Carolina State University; and the University of Montana. Parks Canada funded data collection in Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| 0841884 | |
| OIA‐1736249 | |
| 1907022, 1736249 | |
| U.S. Department of the Interior | |
| California Department of Fish and Wildlife | |
| New Mexico Department of Game and Fish | |
| G10AC00624 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- adaptation
- camouflage mismatch
- climate change
- latitudinal gradient
- phenological mismatch
- phenotypic plasticity
- range edge
- snow
- snowshoe hares
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local climate determines vulnerability to camouflage mismatch in snowshoe hares'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver