Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks

  • M. Réjou-Méchain
  • , H. C. Muller-Landau
  • , M. Detto
  • , S. C. Thomas
  • , T. Le Toan
  • , S. S. Saatchi
  • , J. S. Barreto-Silva
  • , N. A. Bourg
  • , S. Bunyavejchewin
  • , N. Butt
  • , W. Y. Brockelman
  • , M. Cao
  • , D. Cárdenas
  • , J. M. Chiang
  • , G. B. Chuyong
  • , K. Clay
  • , R. Condit
  • , H. S. Dattaraja
  • , S. J. Davies
  • , A. Duque
  • S. Esufali, C. Ewango, R. H.S. Fernando, C. D. Fletcher, I. A.U. N. Gunatilleke, Z. Hao, K. E. Harms, T. B. Hart, B. Hérault, R. W. Howe, S. P. Hubbell, D. J. Johnson, D. Kenfack, A. J. Larson, L. Lin, Y. Lin, J. A. Lutz, J. R. Makana, Y. Malhi, T. R. Marthews, R. W. Mcewan, S. M. Mcmahon, W. J. Mcshea, R. Muscarella, A. Nathalang, N. S.M. Noor, C. J. Nytch, A. A. Oliveira, R. P. Phillips, N. Pongpattananurak, R. Punchi-Manage, R. Salim, J. Schurman, R. Sukumar, H. S. Suresh, U. Suwanvecho, D. W. Thomas, J. Thompson, M. Uríarte, R. Valencia, A. Vicentini, A. T. Wolf, S. Yap, Z. Yuan, C. E. Zartman, J. K. Zimmerman, J. Chave
    • Université de Toulouse
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • University of Toronto
    • Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
    • Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas
    • Wildlife and Plant Conservation
    • University of Oxford
    • University of Queensland
    • Bioresources Technology Unit
    • CAS - Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden
    • Tunghai University
    • University of Buea
    • Indiana University Bloomington
    • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore
    • Universidad Nacional de Colombia
    • University of Peradeniya
    • Wildlife Conservation Society
    • Royal Botanical Garden
    • Forest Research Institute Malaysia
    • CAS - Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology
    • Louisiana State University
    • Project TL2
    • Cirad, UMR Ecologie des Forêts de Guyane (EcoFoG), Campus Agronomique
    • University of Wisconsin-Green Bay
    • University of California at Los Angeles
    • Harvard University
    • Utah State University
    • Wildlife Conservation Society - DRC Program
    • University of Dayton
    • Columbia University
    • University of Puerto Rico
    • Universidade de São Paulo
    • Kasetsart University
    • University of Göttingen
    • Oregon State University
    • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
    • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
    • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia
    • University of the Philippines

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    144 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Advances in forest carbon mapping have the potential to greatly reduce uncertainties in the global carbon budget and to facilitate effective emissions mitigation strategies such as REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation). Though broad-scale mapping is based primarily on remote sensing data, the accuracy of resulting forest carbon stock estimates depends critically on the quality of field measurements and calibration procedures. The mismatch in spatial scales between field inventory plots and larger pixels of current and planned remote sensing products for forest biomass mapping is of particular concern, as it has the potential to introduce errors, especially if forest biomass shows strong local spatial variation. Here, we used 30 large (8-50 ha) globally distributed permanent forest plots to quantify the spatial variability in aboveground biomass density (AGBD in Mg ha-1) at spatial scales ranging from 5 to 250 m (0.025-6.25 ha), and to evaluate the implications of this variability for calibrating remote sensing products using simulated remote sensing footprints. We found that local spatial variability in AGBD is large for standard plot sizes, averaging 46.3% for replicate 0.1 ha subplots within a single large plot, and 16.6% for 1 ha subplots. AGBD showed weak spatial autocorrelation at distances of 20-400 m, with autocorrelation higher in sites with higher topographic variability and statistically significant in half of the sites. We further show that when field calibration plots are smaller than the remote sensing pixels, the high local spatial variability in AGBD leads to a substantial "dilution" bias in calibration parameters, a bias that cannot be removed with standard statistical methods. Our results suggest that topography should be explicitly accounted for in future sampling strategies and that much care must be taken in designing calibration schemes if remote sensing of forest carbon is to achieve its promise.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)6827-6840
    Number of pages14
    JournalBiogeosciences
    Volume11
    Issue number23
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 8 2014

    Funding

    Funder number
    CEBA: ANR-10-LABX-25-01; TULIP: ANR-10-LABX-004
    283093, 291585

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Local spatial structure of forest biomass and its consequences for remote sensing of carbon stocks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this