Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility and minimal fecundity effects explain relatively low Wolbachia frequencies in Drosophila mauritiana

  • Megan K. Meany
  • , William R. Conner
  • , Sophia V. Richter
  • , Jessica A. Bailey
  • , Michael Turelli
  • , Brandon S. Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

Maternally transmitted Wolbachia bacteria infect about half of all insect species. Many Wolbachia cause cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) and reduced egg hatch when uninfected females mate with infected males. Although CI produces a frequency-dependent fitness advantage that leads to high equilibrium Wolbachia frequencies, it does not aid Wolbachia spread from low frequencies. Indeed, the fitness advantages that produce initial Wolbachia spread and maintain non-CI Wolbachia remain elusive. wMau Wolbachia infecting Drosophila mauritiana do not cause CI, despite being very similar to CI-causing wNo from Drosophila simulans (0.068% sequence divergence over 682,494 bp), suggesting recent CI loss. Using draft wMau genomes, we identify a deletion in a CI-associated gene, consistent with theory predicting that selection within host lineages does not act to increase or maintain CI. In the laboratory, wMau shows near-perfect maternal transmission; but we find no significant effect on host fecundity, in contrast to published data. Intermediate wMau frequencies on the island of Mauritius are consistent with a balance between unidentified small, positive fitness effects and imperfect maternal transmission. Our phylogenomic analyses suggest that group-B Wolbachia, including wMau and wPip, diverged from group-A Wolbachia, such as wMel and wRi, 6–46 million years ago, more recently than previously estimated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1278-1295
Number of pages18
JournalEvolution
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

Funding

We thank Margarita Womack for sampling the D. mauritiana used in this study and Daniel Matute for sharing them. We thank Michael Gerth for sharing Nomada genomic data. Isaac Humble, Maria Kirby, and Tim Wheeler assisted with data collection. Michael Gerth, Michael Hague, Amelia Lindsey, and three anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved our manuscript. Computational resources were provided by the University of Montana Genomics Core. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R35GM124701 to BSC. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. MM performed the molecular and phenotypic work, participated in the design of the study, and contributed to the writing; WC performed the phylogenetic and genomic analyses and contributed to the writing; SR contributed to the molecular and phenotypic analyses and to the writing; JB performed the library preparation and contributed to the writing; MT contributed to the analyses, data interpretation, and writing; BSC designed and coordinated the study, contributed to the analyses and data interpretation, and drafted the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication. We thank Margarita Womack for sampling the D. mauritiana used in this study and Daniel Matute for sharing them. We thank Michael Gerth for sharing Nomada genomic data. Isaac Humble, Maria Kirby, and Tim Wheeler assisted with data collection. Michael Gerth, Michael Hague, Amelia Lindsey, and three anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved our manuscript. Computational resources were provided by the University of Montana Genomics Core. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R35GM124701 to BSC. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All phenotypic data, relevant genetic data, and scripts are archived in Dryad (10.5061/dryad.17h7q4v). Illumina reads for D. mauritiana genotypes R60 (SRR8834567), R9 (SRR8834568), and R29 (SRR8834569) are available in GenBank (Bioproject: PRJNA530272). The R60 wMau assembly (GCA_004685025.1) is available in GenBank (Bioproject: PRJNA530278).

FundersFunder number
PRJNA530278, R9, R29, PRJNA530272, SRR8834567
R35GM124701
Boston Scientific Corporation

    Keywords

    • Host–microbe interactions
    • WO phage
    • introgression
    • maternal transmission
    • mitochondria
    • spatial spread

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Loss of cytoplasmic incompatibility and minimal fecundity effects explain relatively low Wolbachia frequencies in Drosophila mauritiana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this