Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale

Ivan Paz-Vinas; Evelyn L. Jensen; Laura D. Bertola; Martin F. Breed; Brian K. Hand; Margaret E. Hunter; Francine Kershaw; Deborah M. Leigh; Gordon Luikart; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M. Miller; Charles B. Van Rees; Gernot Segelbacher; Sean Hoban

doi:10.1111/ele.13732

Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale

Ivan Paz-Vinas, Evelyn L. Jensen, Laura D. Bertola, Martin F. Breed, Brian K. Hand, Margaret E. Hunter, Francine Kershaw, Deborah M. Leigh, Gordon Luikart, Joachim Mergeay, Joshua M. Miller, Charles B. Van Rees, Gernot Segelbacher, Sean Hoban

Flathead Lake Biological Station

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55–67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1282-1284
Number of pages	3
Journal	Ecology Letters
Volume	24
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13732
State	Published - Jun 2021

Keywords

COI
Genbank
anthropogenic impacts
conservation
genetic data archiving
genetic diversity patterns
macroecology
macrogenetics
mitochondrial sequences
population genetics

Access to Document

10.1111/ele.13732

Cite this

@article{446c8e1cbe1a4ab29377b2211601438c,

title = "Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale",

abstract = "Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55–67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.",

keywords = "COI, Genbank, anthropogenic impacts, conservation, genetic data archiving, genetic diversity patterns, macroecology, macrogenetics, mitochondrial sequences, population genetics",

author = "Ivan Paz-Vinas and Jensen, {Evelyn L.} and Bertola, {Laura D.} and Breed, {Martin F.} and Hand, {Brian K.} and Hunter, {Margaret E.} and Francine Kershaw and Leigh, {Deborah M.} and Gordon Luikart and Joachim Mergeay and Miller, {Joshua M.} and {Van Rees}, {Charles B.} and Gernot Segelbacher and Sean Hoban",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1111/ele.13732",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "1282--1284",

journal = "Ecology Letters",

issn = "1461-023X",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale

AU - Paz-Vinas, Ivan

AU - Jensen, Evelyn L.

AU - Bertola, Laura D.

AU - Breed, Martin F.

AU - Hand, Brian K.

AU - Hunter, Margaret E.

AU - Kershaw, Francine

AU - Leigh, Deborah M.

AU - Luikart, Gordon

AU - Mergeay, Joachim

AU - Miller, Joshua M.

AU - Van Rees, Charles B.

AU - Segelbacher, Gernot

AU - Hoban, Sean

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

N2 - Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55–67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.

AB - Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55–67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.

KW - COI

KW - Genbank

KW - anthropogenic impacts

KW - conservation

KW - genetic data archiving

KW - genetic diversity patterns

KW - macroecology

KW - macrogenetics

KW - mitochondrial sequences

KW - population genetics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102808919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ele.13732

DO - 10.1111/ele.13732

M3 - Article

C2 - 33749962

AN - SCOPUS:85102808919

SN - 1461-023X

VL - 24

SP - 1282

EP - 1284

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

IS - 6

ER -

Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this