Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale

  • Ivan Paz-Vinas
  • , Evelyn L. Jensen
  • , Laura D. Bertola
  • , Martin F. Breed
  • , Brian K. Hand
  • , Margaret E. Hunter
  • , Francine Kershaw
  • , Deborah M. Leigh
  • , Gordon Luikart
  • , Joachim Mergeay
  • , Joshua M. Miller
  • , Charles B. Van Rees
  • , Gernot Segelbacher
  • , Sean Hoban

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Millette et al. (Ecology Letters, 2020, 23:55–67) reported no consistent worldwide anthropogenic effects on animal genetic diversity using repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences. We reexamine data from this study, describe genetic marker and scale limitations which might lead to misinterpretations with conservation implications, and provide advice to improve future macrogenetic studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1282-1284
Number of pages3
JournalEcology Letters
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Funding

We acknowledge the support of the GEO BON Genetic Composition Working Group in the development of this manuscript. We also thank Arne Mooers and the reviewers for their comments. I.P-V works in a laboratory supported by the ‘Laboratoire d’Excellence’ (LABEX) entitled TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41).

Funder number
ANR-10-LABX-41

    Keywords

    • COI
    • Genbank
    • anthropogenic impacts
    • conservation
    • genetic data archiving
    • genetic diversity patterns
    • macroecology
    • macrogenetics
    • mitochondrial sequences
    • population genetics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Macrogenetic studies must not ignore limitations of genetic markers and scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this