TY - JOUR
T1 - Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus
T2 - Do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes?
AU - Moczek, Armin P.
AU - Emlen, Douglas J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank M. Beebee, K. Bright, C. P. Klingenberg, H. F. Nijhout, L. Mojonnier and J. Rose for helpful discussions and constructive comments on the manuscript, and Shane Richards for the excellent drawings of O. taurus. This paper also benefited from comments and suggestions by three anonymous referees. K. Fiedler, P. Klopfer and B. Hölldobler provided valuable advice throughout the course of this study, and P. and M. Klopfer kindly allowed us access to their pastures. We thank J. Mercer and the Duke Morphometrics Laboratory for access to equipment. This work was supported in part by a scholarship by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) to A.P.M. and an NSF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship to D.J.E.
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - In a variety of organisms morphological variation is discrete rather than continuous. Discrete variation within a sex has attracted particular interest as it is thought to reflect the existence of alternative adaptations to a heterogeneous selection environment. The beetle Onthophagus taurus shows a dimorphism for male horns: Males that exceed a critical body size develop a pair of long, curved horns on their heads, while smaller males remain hornless. In this study we report on the alternative reproductive tactics used by males with these two morphologies, and present experimental and behavioural data suggesting that these alternative tactics selectively favour discretely different male phenotypes. Horned males aggressively defended tunnel entrances containing breeding females. Fights involved the use of horns, and males with longer horns were more likely to win fights. In contrast, hornless males employed nonaggressive sneaking behaviours when faced with competitively superior males. Sneaking behaviours appeared to require high degrees of manoeuvrability inside tunnels to access and mate with females despite the presence of a guarding male. Comparisons of running performances of males with identical body sizes but different horn lengths suggest that the possession of horns reduces male agility inside tunnels. Thus, horn possession confers a clear advantage to males using fighting behaviours to access females, whereas hornlessness may be favoured in males that rely primarily on sneaking behaviours. Combined, the two alternative reproductive tactics used by male O. taurus appear to favour opposite horn phenotypes, which may explain the paucity of intermediate morphologies in natural populations of O. taurus. (C) 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
AB - In a variety of organisms morphological variation is discrete rather than continuous. Discrete variation within a sex has attracted particular interest as it is thought to reflect the existence of alternative adaptations to a heterogeneous selection environment. The beetle Onthophagus taurus shows a dimorphism for male horns: Males that exceed a critical body size develop a pair of long, curved horns on their heads, while smaller males remain hornless. In this study we report on the alternative reproductive tactics used by males with these two morphologies, and present experimental and behavioural data suggesting that these alternative tactics selectively favour discretely different male phenotypes. Horned males aggressively defended tunnel entrances containing breeding females. Fights involved the use of horns, and males with longer horns were more likely to win fights. In contrast, hornless males employed nonaggressive sneaking behaviours when faced with competitively superior males. Sneaking behaviours appeared to require high degrees of manoeuvrability inside tunnels to access and mate with females despite the presence of a guarding male. Comparisons of running performances of males with identical body sizes but different horn lengths suggest that the possession of horns reduces male agility inside tunnels. Thus, horn possession confers a clear advantage to males using fighting behaviours to access females, whereas hornlessness may be favoured in males that rely primarily on sneaking behaviours. Combined, the two alternative reproductive tactics used by male O. taurus appear to favour opposite horn phenotypes, which may explain the paucity of intermediate morphologies in natural populations of O. taurus. (C) 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033845113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/anbe.1999.1342
DO - 10.1006/anbe.1999.1342
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033845113
SN - 0003-3472
VL - 59
SP - 459
EP - 466
JO - Animal Behaviour
JF - Animal Behaviour
IS - 2
ER -