TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping sage-grouse fence-collision risk
T2 - Spatially explicit models for targeting conservation implementation
AU - Stevens, Bryan S.
AU - Naugle, David E.
AU - Dennis, Brian
AU - Connelly, John W.
AU - Griffiths, Tim
AU - Reese, Kerry P.
PY - 2013/6
Y1 - 2013/6
N2 - Recent research suggested greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sagegrouse) fence collision may be widespread, and fence-marking methods have been developed for reducing prairie-grouse collision in sagebrush-steppe habitats. However, research also suggested sage-grouse collision was highly variable, and managers implementing mitigation desire targeting tools to prioritize mitigation efforts as a function of risk. We fit collision-risk models using widely available covariates to a sage-grouse fence-collision data set from Idaho, USA, and developed spatially explicit versions of the top model for all known sage-grouse breeding habitats (i.e., within 3 km of leks) in 10 of 11 western states where sage-grouse are found. Our models prioritize breeding habitats for mitigation as a function of terrain ruggedness and distance to nearest lek, and suggest that a relatively small proportion of the total landscape (6-14%) in each state would result in >1 collision over a lekking season. Managers can use resulting models to prioritize fence-marking by focusing efforts on high risk landscapes. Moreover, our models provide a spatially explicit tool to efficiently target conservation investments, and exemplify the way that researchers and managers can work together to turn scientific understanding into effective conservation solutions.
AB - Recent research suggested greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; hereafter, sagegrouse) fence collision may be widespread, and fence-marking methods have been developed for reducing prairie-grouse collision in sagebrush-steppe habitats. However, research also suggested sage-grouse collision was highly variable, and managers implementing mitigation desire targeting tools to prioritize mitigation efforts as a function of risk. We fit collision-risk models using widely available covariates to a sage-grouse fence-collision data set from Idaho, USA, and developed spatially explicit versions of the top model for all known sage-grouse breeding habitats (i.e., within 3 km of leks) in 10 of 11 western states where sage-grouse are found. Our models prioritize breeding habitats for mitigation as a function of terrain ruggedness and distance to nearest lek, and suggest that a relatively small proportion of the total landscape (6-14%) in each state would result in >1 collision over a lekking season. Managers can use resulting models to prioritize fence-marking by focusing efforts on high risk landscapes. Moreover, our models provide a spatially explicit tool to efficiently target conservation investments, and exemplify the way that researchers and managers can work together to turn scientific understanding into effective conservation solutions.
KW - Avian collision
KW - Centrocercus urophasianus
KW - Collision mitigation
KW - Fence collision
KW - Fence markers
KW - Infrastructure marking
KW - Sage-grouse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940238413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/wsb.273
DO - 10.1002/wsb.273
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84940238413
SN - 0091-7648
VL - 37
SP - 409
EP - 415
JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin
JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin
IS - 2
ER -