TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodological Variation Among Studies Evaluating Pain Processing in Tendinopathy
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Jayaseelan, Dhinu
AU - Post, Andrew
AU - Sault, Josiah
AU - Mischke, John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background/Objectives: Tendinopathy is a condition associated with pain and limited function. While upper and lower extremity tendinopathies may have different functional implications, there have been a number of reports supporting different patterns of dysfunction in pain processing and inhibition. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the methods across studies examining pain processing in patients with upper and lower extremity tendinopathy. Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus) and gray literature sources were searched from inception through 15 April 2024, using appropriate keywords and relevant synonyms. Results: In total, 3219 titles were retrieved from the searches, with 43 studies retained for final inclusion. Of the 43 studies, 22 were specific to upper extremity tendinopathies, 19 were specific to lower extremity tendinopathies, and 2 studies included mixed samples. Physical testing to detect nervous system sensitization was most commonly performed using pressure pain thresholds. Although infrequent, questionnaire instruments were used mostly to include the central sensitization inventory. Substantial variation was noted across studies in mode of testing and instruments used, while patient demographics and inclusion criteria were not clearly reported in many instances. Thirty-one studies (72%) reported nervous system sensitization or dysfunction in tendinopathy, while 13 (28%) did not. Conclusions: While the difference between pain processing in tendinopathy is likely multifactorial, the results of this review identified substantial variability in methodology used and reporting in tendon pain research. As inconsistency in evidence can limit clinical guidance, efforts to standardize tendinopathy pain research appear warranted.
AB - Background/Objectives: Tendinopathy is a condition associated with pain and limited function. While upper and lower extremity tendinopathies may have different functional implications, there have been a number of reports supporting different patterns of dysfunction in pain processing and inhibition. The purpose of this scoping review was to examine the methods across studies examining pain processing in patients with upper and lower extremity tendinopathy. Methods: Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus) and gray literature sources were searched from inception through 15 April 2024, using appropriate keywords and relevant synonyms. Results: In total, 3219 titles were retrieved from the searches, with 43 studies retained for final inclusion. Of the 43 studies, 22 were specific to upper extremity tendinopathies, 19 were specific to lower extremity tendinopathies, and 2 studies included mixed samples. Physical testing to detect nervous system sensitization was most commonly performed using pressure pain thresholds. Although infrequent, questionnaire instruments were used mostly to include the central sensitization inventory. Substantial variation was noted across studies in mode of testing and instruments used, while patient demographics and inclusion criteria were not clearly reported in many instances. Thirty-one studies (72%) reported nervous system sensitization or dysfunction in tendinopathy, while 13 (28%) did not. Conclusions: While the difference between pain processing in tendinopathy is likely multifactorial, the results of this review identified substantial variability in methodology used and reporting in tendon pain research. As inconsistency in evidence can limit clinical guidance, efforts to standardize tendinopathy pain research appear warranted.
KW - pain assessment
KW - physical therapy
KW - sensitization
KW - tendon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213216485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm13247592
DO - 10.3390/jcm13247592
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85213216485
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 13
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 24
M1 - 7592
ER -