Mindfulness training applied to addiction therapy: Insights into the neural mechanisms of positive behavioral change

Eric L. Garland, Matthew O. Howard, Sarah E. Priddy, Patrick A. McConnell, Michael R. Riquino, Brett Froeliger

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Dual-process models from neuroscience suggest that addiction is driven by dysregulated interactions between bottom-up neural processes underpinning reward learning and top-down neural functions subserving executive function. Over time, drug use causes atrophy in prefrontally mediated cognitive control networks and hijacks striatal circuits devoted to processing natural rewards in service of compulsive seeking of drug-related reward. In essence, mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) can be conceptualized as mental training programs for exercising, strengthening, and remediating these functional brain networks. This review describes how MBIs may remediate addiction by regulating frontostriatal circuits, thereby restoring an adaptive balance between these top-down and bottom-up processes. Empirical evidence is presented suggesting that MBIs facilitate cognitive control over drug-related automaticity, attentional bias, and drug cue reactivity, while enhancing responsiveness to natural rewards. Findings from the literature are incorporated into an integrative account of the neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based therapies for effecting positive behavior change in the context of addiction recovery. Implications of our theoretical framework are presented with respect to how these insights can inform the addiction therapy process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-63
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroscience and Neuroeconomics
StatePublished - Jul 27 2016


  • Addiction
  • Cue reactivity
  • Frontostriatal
  • Hedonic dysregulation
  • Mindfulness
  • Reward
  • Savoring


Dive into the research topics of 'Mindfulness training applied to addiction therapy: Insights into the neural mechanisms of positive behavioral change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this