Abstract
Like many aggregating animals, unionid mussels occurring at high densities can create patches or 'hotspots' of biogeochemical activity directly through nutrient regeneration and material flux and indirectly by movement of sediments through physical activities of the organism. We examined the effect of unionid mussels and nutrient limitation on denitrification and nitrification rates across a gradient of ambient mussel diversity and density in the Kiamichi River, Oklahoma, USA. We incubated pooled sediment samples and measured denitrification rates (with amendments of N as KNO3, C as dextrose, N and C together, and no amendment), nitrification rates, and pore-water chemistry at each site. Mussel biomass and alleviation from N limitation influenced denitrification rates. In unamended sediments, denitrification rates decreased with increasing mussel densities, and were not limited by N or C. However, sediments with mussels had higher denitrification rates with the addition of N. Nitrification rates were not correlated with mussel biomass, but rates did increase marginally with the proportion of Actinonaias ligamentina (a relatively more mobile species) in each mussel bed. Pore-water concentrations of NO3 - and NH4+ were highest at high-mussel-biomass sites. Our study builds on existing evidence of the importance of unionid mussels in nutrient cycling in streams, by relating their effects to organism biomass and alleviation from nutrient limitation. The N limitation of denitrification rates found in our study may mean that mussel beds become denitrification hotspots given anticipated increases in nutrient availability. However, the continued decline of these organisms probably will reduce the denitrification capacity of mussel beds.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 276-286 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Freshwater Science |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2018 |
Funding
We thank the many landowners for allowing access to their property and advice on river access. W. K. Dodds, K. J. Forshay, C. C. Vaughn, and U. H. Mahl provided comments that greatly improved the manuscript. Two anonymous referees and the Associate Editor provided helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript. MTT was supported in part by US National Science Foundation (NSF) Macrosystems grant EF1065255. CLA was supported in part by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Science to Achieve Results (STAR) Graduate Fellowship Program. Support for JDB was provided by an NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates supplement to the Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Research grant. The Oklahoma Biological Survey provided transportation and field housing support. EPA has not officially endorsed this publication, and the views expressed herein may not reflect the views of the EPA.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| EF1065255 | |
| Environmental Protection Agency |
Keywords
- Benthic sediments
- Bioturbation
- Denitrification
- Nitrification
- Nutrient limitation
- Unionid