Abstract
Historically, relying on plot-level inventories impeded our ability to quantify large-scale change in plant biomass, a key indicator of conservation practice outcomes in rangeland systems. Recent technological advances enable assessment at scales appropriate to inform management by providing spatially comprehensive estimates of productivity that are partitioned by plant functional group across all contiguous US rangelands. We partnered with the Sage Grouse and Lesser Prairie-Chicken Initiatives and the Nebraska Natural Legacy Project to demonstrate the ability of these new datasets to quantify multi-scale changes and heterogeneity in plant biomass following mechanical tree removal, prescribed fire, and prescribed grazing. In Oregon's sagebrush steppe, for example, juniper tree removal resulted in a 21% increase in one pasture's productivity and an 18% decline in another. In Nebraska's Loess Canyons, perennial grass productivity initially declined 80% at sites invaded by trees that were prescriptively burned, but then fully recovered post-fire, representing a 492% increase from nadir. In Kansas' Shortgrass Prairie, plant biomass increased 4-fold (966,809 kg/ha) in pastures that were prescriptively grazed, with gains highly dependent upon precipitation as evidenced by sensitivity of remotely sensed estimates (SD ± 951,308 kg/ha). Our results emphasize that next-generation remote sensing datasets empower land managers to move beyond simplistic control versus treatment study designs to explore nuances in plant biomass in unprecedented ways. The products of new remote sensing technologies also accelerate adaptive management and help communicate wildlife and livestock forage benefits from management to diverse stakeholders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 116359 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Management |
| Volume | 324 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 15 2022 |
Funding
Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation (OIA-1920938), United States Department of Agriculture – Natural Resources Conservation Service and Pheasants Forever (PG18-62799-01 and Sage Grouse Initiative 2.0-19-06), Nebraska Game & Parks Commission (W-125-R-1), US Department of Agriculture NIFA AFRI (M1903198), the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, and the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Arkansas. This work was made possible by the NRCS Working Lands for Wildlife in support of sage-grouse and prairie-chicken conservation and the USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project and Arkansas Game and Fish Commission through cooperative agreement 1434-04HQRU1567. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Funding was provided by the National Science Foundation ( OIA-1920938 ), United States Department of Agriculture – Natural Resources Conservation Service and Pheasants Forever ( PG18-62799-01 and Sage Grouse Initiative 2.0-19-06 ), Nebraska Game & Parks Commission ( W-125-R-1 ), US Department of Agriculture NIFA AFRI ( M1903198 ), the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, and the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Arkansas . This work was made possible by the NRCS Working Lands for Wildlife in support of sage-grouse and prairie-chicken conservation and the USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project and Arkansas Game and Fish Commission through cooperative agreement 1434-04HQRU1567 . Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Arkansas Game and Fish Commission | 1434-04HQRU1567 |
| 2.0-19-06, PG18-62799-01 | |
| Nebraska Game and Parks Commission | W-125-R-1 |
| M1903198 | |
| OIA-1920938 | |
| Natural Resources Conservation Service | |
Keywords
- Adaptive management
- Monitoring
- Private lands conservation
- Remote sensing
- Scale
- restoration