Nietzsche Contra the Naturalists

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Even among scholars who emphasize Nietzsche’s naturalism (“the naturalists”), what it actually involves is disputed. This article identifies the foundations of Nietzsche’s naturalism and then elaborates on these foundations through a critical analysis of the works of those naturalists who also identify them. Nietzsche is a methodological naturalist, who, epistemically, is a reliabilist, and while he acknowledges the innate limitations of our cognitive inheritance, which is reflected in his perspectivism, he sees no reason to conclude that we cannot grasp the natural world truly. As to the primary issue in scientific explanation, causation, Nietzsche adopts a regularity theory as early as The Gay Science, and, on the basis of this theory, rejects determinism. One consequence of this analysis is that Nietzsche’s naturalism is not as restrictive as the naturalists tend to portray it, and this opens up new possibilities for interpreting many of his other commitments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-96
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Nietzsche Studies
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • causality
  • cognition
  • determinism
  • epistemic naturalism
  • perspectivism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nietzsche Contra the Naturalists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this