Nonconsumptive effects of brook trout predators reduce secondary production of mayfly prey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The nonconsumptive effects of predators on prey include behavioral, physiological, and life-history changes that reduce the risk of predation but have associated energetic or fitness costs to prey individuals and populations. Biologists have documented such changes for a wide array of predator–prey interactions in a variety of ecosystems; however, the energetic cost of nonconsumptive effects to prey populations has rarely been measured directly. Using a reach-scale manipulation of a naturally-fishless stream, we added chemical cues produced by live Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill, 1814) to simulate the presence of trout predation risk, and we quantified the impact of nonconsumptive effects on the secondary production of mayfly prey in the stream. The addition of trout chemical cues reduced the secondary production of larval Baetis mayflies in the treatment reach by 17% compared to an upstream, unmanipulated reference reach. This reduction was driven by smaller body size and earlier emergence of mayflies from the reach with added predator cues. The nonconsumptive effects of a predator can consequently reduce the flux of energy through a dominant stream invertebrate by altering individual lifehistory and development patterns. Furthermore, quantifying the population-level impact of nonconsumptive effects enables understanding the extent to which these widespread predator effects shape food-web dynamics and ecosystem processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-558
Number of pages10
JournalFreshwater Science
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Funding

We thank S. Hale, W. Brown, H. Griscom, G. Aldridge, P. Mudrak, T. Niekum, K. Barnes, C. Bell, E. Eakin, M. Carpenter, N. Spackman, K. Porter, and K. Brown for help in the field and in the lab. S. Hale deserves special thanks for tirelessly hiking more than 60,000 vertical feet to help keep the field experiment running. We are grateful to the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory and the Gunnison National Forest for access to Rock Creek. D. Doak, C. Martínez del Rio, T. Collier, A. Benke, and an anonymous reviewer provided comments that greatly improved the manuscript. V. Leshyk created the illustration in Fig. 1. This research was funded by the University of Wyoming’s School of Environment and Natural Resources, Department of Zoology and Physiology, and Program in Ecology through NSF grant EPS-0447681. Additional support came from NSF grant DEB-0516035 to B. L. Peckarsky and A. R. McIntosh and from the American Museum of Natural History, Colorado Mountain Club Foundation, Sigma Xi Scientific Research Society, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Wyoming NASA Space Grant Consortium, and Northern Arizona University’s Center for Ecosystem Science and Society.

FundersFunder number
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
DEB-0516035, EPS-0447681
American Museum of Natural History
Northern Arizona University
SIGMA Clermont

    Keywords

    • Baetis
    • Field experiment
    • Mayfly
    • Nonconsumptive effects
    • Predator–prey interactions
    • Risk effects
    • Salvelinus fontinalis
    • Secondary production
    • Trout

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nonconsumptive effects of brook trout predators reduce secondary production of mayfly prey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this