Observed variability of Lake Superior pCO2

Nazan Atilla, Galen A. McKinley, Val Bennington, Matthew Baehr, Noel Urban, Michael DeGrandpre, Ankur R. Desai, Chin Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations


We present and compare direct and indirect pCO2 observations taken in Lake Superior in the last decade and use them to understand temporal and spatial variability in lake carbon cycle processes. In situ observations from 2001 and biannual survey data for 1996-2006 indicate that Lake Superior was, on average, supersaturated (annual mean = 46.7 ± 17.3 Pa [461 ± 171 μatm]) with respect to atmospheric pCO2 (mean 5 38.3 6 0.6 Pa) in April and close to equilibrium (mean = 37.5 ± 6.7 Pa) with respect to atmospheric pCO2 (mean = 36.4 ± 0.7 Pa) in August. Both data sets indicate that temporal variability in surface lake pCO2 from weekly to interannual timescales was predominantly controlled by changing dissolved inorganic carbon and associated changes in pH. An unstratified water column appears to have limited pCO2 fluctuations in spring. Through summer and into early fall, pCO2 variability on a daily timescale at 12 m increased with time to a maximum amplitude of 19 Pa, likely as a result of internal waves on the thermocline. Year-to-year changes in mean surface lake pCO2 and temperature were of the same sign and approximate magnitude at all observed points, consistent with the lake's small size relative to the synoptic-scale meteorological systems that force it. Variability in pCO2 was not correlated with major climate indices. While these data provide a first large-scale overview of Lake Superior's pCO2 and its temporal variability, their time-space resolution and accuracy are not sufficient to further refine previously imbalanced lake-wide carbon budgets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-786
Number of pages12
JournalLimnology and Oceanography
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'Observed variability of Lake Superior pCO2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this