Panel: The credibility crisis in IS

Hope Koch, Clayton Looney, David Firth, John King, Paul Pavlou, Eileen M. Trauth

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

A credibility crisis continues to plague the Information Systems (IS) discipline. For almost a decade, IS has struggled to obtain and maintain its stature as a highly-respected academic discipline. The recent demise of several IS programs around the world highlights the credibility crisis, as departments have been subsumed into other business disciplines, or worse yet, abandoned entirely. In a recent MIS Quarterly article, Gill and Bhattacherjee (2009) highlight some of the challenges facing IS: low student enrollments, research that is rarely discussed in our classrooms, and research that fails to make an impact in practice. While useful tactics in terms of research (Dennis et al., 2008), student recruitment (Koch and Kayworth, 2009; Looney and Akbulut, 2007), and pedagogy (Firth et al., 2008) have surfaced in the literature, a holistic strategy for addressing the credibility crisis has yet to emerge. This panel brings together a group of IS professors to offer their perspectives on a series of propositions about the Credibility Crisis in the IS Discipline, and engage in an animated debate with each other and the audience on their positions.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010
Pages5018-5021
Number of pages4
StatePublished - 2010
Event16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010 - Lima, Peru
Duration: Aug 12 2010Aug 15 2010

Publication series

Name16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010
Volume7

Conference

Conference16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010
Country/TerritoryPeru
CityLima
Period08/12/1008/15/10

Keywords

  • Education
  • Enrollment
  • Future of IS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Panel: The credibility crisis in IS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this