TY - JOUR
T1 - Parasitic plants
T2 - Parallels and contrasts with herbivores
AU - Pennings, Steven C.
AU - Callaway, Ragan M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements We are grateful to L. Adler and S. Puustinen for sending unpublished manuscripts and for making helpful comments on this manuscript. Helpful comments by two anonymous reviewers and R. Monson much improved the manuscript. We thank NSF (OCE 99–82133, Pennings) and USDA (NRICGP 97–98–35315–6068, Callaway) for financial support.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Parasitic plants are common in natural communities, but are largely ignored in plant community theory. Interactions between parasitic plants and hosts often parallel those between herbivores and plants: both types of consumers display host preferences, reduce host biomass and alter host allocation patterns, modify plant community structure and dynamics, and mediate interactions between host plants and other organisms. In other cases, basic differences in mobility, hormonal and elemental composition and resource capture between plants and animals lead to different effects: parasitic plants have broad host ranges, affect and are affected by host plant physiology because of similar hormonal pathways between parasite and host, do not alter nutrient cycling as extensively as do herbivores, and may simultaneously parasitize and compete with hosts. Many fundamental aspects of the ecology of parasitic plants remain poorly studied, and research to date has been dominated by laboratory studies and studies of crop pests, rather than by studies of natural communities.
AB - Parasitic plants are common in natural communities, but are largely ignored in plant community theory. Interactions between parasitic plants and hosts often parallel those between herbivores and plants: both types of consumers display host preferences, reduce host biomass and alter host allocation patterns, modify plant community structure and dynamics, and mediate interactions between host plants and other organisms. In other cases, basic differences in mobility, hormonal and elemental composition and resource capture between plants and animals lead to different effects: parasitic plants have broad host ranges, affect and are affected by host plant physiology because of similar hormonal pathways between parasite and host, do not alter nutrient cycling as extensively as do herbivores, and may simultaneously parasitize and compete with hosts. Many fundamental aspects of the ecology of parasitic plants remain poorly studied, and research to date has been dominated by laboratory studies and studies of crop pests, rather than by studies of natural communities.
KW - Parasite
KW - Parasite-host interactions
KW - Parasitic plant
KW - Plant community
KW - Plant-herbivore interactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036943509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00442-002-0923-7
DO - 10.1007/s00442-002-0923-7
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:0036943509
SN - 0029-8549
VL - 131
SP - 479
EP - 489
JO - Oecologia
JF - Oecologia
IS - 4
ER -