TY - CHAP
T1 - Partnership-Sustainability Challenges
AU - Koehn, Peter H.
AU - Obamba, Milton O.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Peter H. Koehn and Milton O. Obamba.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Walsh and Kahn (2010, p. 53) alert us that “a collaboration may last little longer than a passing dream, or it may endure for a lifetime and beyond.” Although even the most mutually beneficial collaborations can reach temporal limits, sustainability is a core component in symmetrical-partnership undertakings. In all transnational higher-education partnerships (THEPs), partners “need to be forward thinking and consider the sustainability of what they are doing” (Wanni et al. 2010, pp. 45, 47). The overarching challenge for transnational arrangements devoted to research and development is to remain in partnership long enough to build the mutual institutional capacity and human capabilities required for autonomous leadership and “ongoing professional development and renewal” (Crossley et al. 2005, p. 91). Durability enables THEPs to fulfill interinstitutional objectives and to maximize positive societal outcomes. In the asymmetrical partnership, the Northern university is prone to take its benefits (desired research permission, funded international students, trips for administrators, and sizeable overhead) and “run” (Shaeffer 2008, p. 38). Near symmetry in partnership design and management increases the likelihood that the required degree of sustainability will be attained.
AB - Walsh and Kahn (2010, p. 53) alert us that “a collaboration may last little longer than a passing dream, or it may endure for a lifetime and beyond.” Although even the most mutually beneficial collaborations can reach temporal limits, sustainability is a core component in symmetrical-partnership undertakings. In all transnational higher-education partnerships (THEPs), partners “need to be forward thinking and consider the sustainability of what they are doing” (Wanni et al. 2010, pp. 45, 47). The overarching challenge for transnational arrangements devoted to research and development is to remain in partnership long enough to build the mutual institutional capacity and human capabilities required for autonomous leadership and “ongoing professional development and renewal” (Crossley et al. 2005, p. 91). Durability enables THEPs to fulfill interinstitutional objectives and to maximize positive societal outcomes. In the asymmetrical partnership, the Northern university is prone to take its benefits (desired research permission, funded international students, trips for administrators, and sizeable overhead) and “run” (Shaeffer 2008, p. 38). Near symmetry in partnership design and management increases the likelihood that the required degree of sustainability will be attained.
KW - Canadian International Development Agency
KW - Development Partnership
KW - External Funding
KW - Japan International Cooperation Agency
KW - Ongoing Professional Development
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85145404942
U2 - 10.1057/9781137481757_8
DO - 10.1057/9781137481757_8
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85145404942
T3 - International and Development Education
SP - 131
EP - 141
BT - International and Development Education
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
ER -