Abstract
This short essay surveys 39 bills introduced during the 2025 Montana legislative session that targeted the judiciary. While most failed, nine became law. The essay organizes these bills into five categories: (1) changing judicial elections, (2) increasing the legislature’s oversight and authority over the courts, (3) changing the standards applicable to sitting judges, (4) creating non-Article VII courts and stripping Article VII courts of jurisdiction, and (5) changing the standards and processes in civil cases. The hope is that this short piece serves as a springboard for further research and dialogue on the origins and implications of this unprecedented legislative session.
Particular attention is given to House Bill 409, which prohibits Montana courts from using variations of the preliminary injunction test set forth in Mont. Code Ann. § 27-19-201. Despite this new prohibition, Montana courts can still consider federal precedent when deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction.
Particular attention is given to House Bill 409, which prohibits Montana courts from using variations of the preliminary injunction test set forth in Mont. Code Ann. § 27-19-201. Despite this new prohibition, Montana courts can still consider federal precedent when deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Montana Law Review |
| State | Accepted/In press - 2025 |