Quantification of organic aerosol and brown carbon evolution in fresh wildfire plumes

  • Brett B. Palm
  • , Qiaoyun Peng
  • , Carley D. Fredrickson
  • , Ben H. Lee
  • , Lauren A. Garofalo
  • , Matson A. Pothier
  • , Sonia M. Kreidenweis
  • , Delphine K. Farmer
  • , Rudra P. Pokhrel
  • , Yingjie Shen
  • , Shane M. Murphy
  • , Wade Permar
  • , Lu Hu
  • , Teresa L. Campos
  • , Samuel R. Hall
  • , Kirk Ullmann
  • , Xuan Zhang
  • , Frank Flocke
  • , Emily V. Fischer
  • , Joel A. Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

167 Scopus citations

Abstract

The evolution of organic aerosol (OA) and brown carbon (BrC) in wildfire plumes, including the relative contributions of primary versus secondary sources, has been uncertain in part because of limited knowledge of the precursor emissions and the chemical environment of smoke plumes. We made airborne measurements of a suite of reactive trace gases, particle composition, and optical properties in fresh western US wildfire smoke in July through August 2018. We use these observations to quantify primary versus secondary sources of biomass-burning OA (BBPOA versus BBSOA) and BrC in wildfire plumes. When a daytime wildfire plume dilutes by a factor of 5 to 10, we estimate that up to onethird of the primary OA has evaporated and subsequently reacted to form BBSOA with near unit yield. The reactions of measured BBSOA precursors contribute only 13 ± 3% of the total BBSOA source, with evaporated BBPOA comprising the rest. We find that oxidation of phenolic compounds contributes the majority of BBSOA from emitted vapors. The corresponding particulate nitrophenolic compounds are estimated to explain 29 ± 15% of average BrC light absorption at 405 nm (BrC Abs405) measured in the first few hours of plume evolution, despite accounting for just 4 ± 2% of average OA mass. These measurements provide quantitative constraints on the role of dilution-driven evaporation of OA and subsequent radical-driven oxidation on the fate of biomass-burning OA and BrC in daytime wildfire plumes and point to the need to understand how processing of nighttime emissions differs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29469-29477
Number of pages9
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume117
Issue number47
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 24 2020

Funding

We sincerely thank everyone involved in the planning and operation of the 2018 WE-CAN campaign and 2019 MOONLIGHT campaign. B.B.P., Q.P., C.D.F., B.H.L., and J.A.T. were supported by US NSF Grant AGS-1652688 and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Grant NA17OAR4310012). L.A.G., M.A.P., S.M.K., and D.K.F. were supported by NOAA Grant NA17OAR4310010. R.P.P., Y.S., and S.M.M. acknowledge support from US Environmental Protection Agency Grant R835883. This research was supported in part by US NSF Grants AGS- 1650786 and AGS-1650275. This material is based upon work supported by the NCAR, which is a major facility sponsored by the US NSF under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. The data were collected using NSF's Lower Atmosphere Observing Facilities, which are managed and operated by NCAR's Earth Observing Laboratory. The operational and scientific support from NCAR's Earth Observing Laboratory and Research Aircraft Facility is gratefully acknowledged. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We sincerely thank everyone involved in the planning and operation of the 2018 WE-CAN campaign and 2019 MOONLIGHT campaign. B.B.P., Q.P., C.D.F., B.H.L., and J.A.T. were supported by US NSF Grant AGS-1652688 and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Grant NA17OAR4310012). L.A.G., M.A.P., S.M.K., and D.K.F. were supported by NOAA Grant NA17OAR4310010. R.P.P., Y.S., and S.M.M. acknowledge support from US Environmental Protection Agency Grant R835883. This research was supported in part by US NSF Grants AGS-1650786 and AGS-1650275. This material is based upon work supported by the NCAR, which is a major facility sponsored by the US NSF under Cooperative Agreement 1852977. The data were collected using NSF’s Lower Atmosphere Observing Facilities, which are managed and operated by NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory. The operational and scientific support from NCAR’s Earth Observing Laboratory and Research Aircraft Facility is gratefully acknowledged.

FundersFunder number
AGS-1652688
1852977
AGS-1650786, AGS-1650275, R835883
National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNA17OAR4310010, NA17OAR4310012

    Keywords

    • Aircraft measurements
    • Biomass burning
    • Brown carbon
    • Phenolic compounds
    • Secondary organic aerosol

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quantification of organic aerosol and brown carbon evolution in fresh wildfire plumes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this