Abstract
In their recent article, N. Spillane and G. Smith (2007) suggested that reservation-dwelling American Indians have higher rates of problem drinking than do either non-American Indians or those American Indians living in nonreservation settings. These authors further argued that problematic alcohol use patterns in reservation communities are due to the lack of contingencies between drinking and "standard life reinforcers" (SLRs), such as employment, housing, education, and health care. This comment presents evidence that these arguments were based on a partial review of the literature. Weaknesses in the application of SLR constructs to American Indian reservation communities are identified as is the need for culturally contextualized empirical evidence supporting this theory and its application. Cautionary notes are offered about the development of literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and policy recommendations for American Indian communities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 339-343 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Psychological Bulletin |
| Volume | 135 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2009 |
Funding
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health | P01MH042473, R01MH075831, R01MH073965 |
| R01DA003371 | |
| R01AA008474 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- American Indians
- alcohol
- problem drinking
- reservation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on a Proposed Theory of Reservation-Dwelling American Indian Alcohol Use: Comment on Spillane and Smith (2007)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver