Regime shifts and panarchies in regional scale social-ecological water systems

  • Lance Gunderson
  • , Barbara A. Cosens
  • , Brian C. Chaffin
  • , Craig A.Tom Arnold
  • , Alexander K. Fremier
  • , Ahjond S. Garmestani
  • , Robin Kundis Craig
  • , Hannah Gosnell
  • , Hannah E. Birge
  • , Craig R. Allen
  • , Melinda H. Benson
  • , Ryan R. Morrison
  • , Mark C. Stone
  • , Joseph A. Hamm
  • , Kristine Nemec
  • , Edella Schlager
  • , Dagmar Llewellyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article we summarize histories of nonlinear, complex interactions among societal, legal, and ecosystem dynamics in six North American water basins, as they respond to changing climate. These case studies were chosen to explore the conditions for emergence of adaptive governance in heavily regulated and developed social-ecological systems nested within a hierarchical governmental system. We summarize resilience assessments conducted in each system to provide a synthesis and reference by the other articles in this special feature. We also present a general framework used to evaluate the interactions between society and ecosystem regimes and the governance regimes chosen to mediate those interactions. The case studies show different ways that adaptive governance may be triggered, facilitated, or constrained by ecological and/or legal processes. The resilience assessments indicate that complex interactions among the governance and ecosystem components of these systems can produce different trajectories, which include patterns of (a) development and stabilization, (b) cycles of crisis and recovery, which includes lurches in adaptation and learning, and (3) periods of innovation, novelty, and transformation. Exploration of cross scale (Panarchy) interactions among levels and sectors of government and society illustrate that they may constrain development trajectories, but may also provide stability during crisis or innovation at smaller scales; create crises, but may also facilitate recovery; and constrain system transformation, but may also provide windows of opportunity in which transformation, and the resources to accomplish it, may occur. The framework is the starting point for our exploration of how law might play a role in enhancing the capacity of social-ecological systems to adapt to climate change.

Original languageEnglish
Article number31
JournalEcology and Society
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Funding

This work was developed under the Adaptive Water Governance Project, funded by the U.S. National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation, NSF DBI-1052875. The authors would like to thank Margaret Palmer and Jonathan Kramer of SESYNC for their belief in and support of the project. We would also like to thank the all participants in the Adaptive Water Governance Team whose work is reflected in the articles in this special feature and without whom it would not have been possible. The Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by a cooperative agreement among the U.S. Geological Survey, the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, the University of Nebraska, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Wildlife Management Institute.

FundersFunder number
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
1052875, DBI-1052875, 1633831

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Adaptive governance
    • Cross scale dynamics
    • Social ecological system
    • Transformation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Regime shifts and panarchies in regional scale social-ecological water systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this