Responses of biological soil crusts to rehabilitation strategies

  • Taylor Chock
  • , Anita J. Antoninka
  • , Akasha M. Faist
  • , Matthew A. Bowker
  • , Jayne Belnap
  • , Nichole N. Barger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are common to dryland ecosystems and can influence a broad suite of soil ecological functions including stability and surface hydrology. Due to long recovery times following disturbance, there is a clear need for rehabilitation strategies to enhance the recovery of biocrust communities. Essential to biocrust recovery are exopolysaccharides (EPS): secretions comprised mainly of high molecular weight polymers that protect cyanobacteria and other biocrust organisms from harsh environmental conditions. We examined whether biocrust rehabilitation strategies (combinations of inoculation with surface shading and artificial soil stabilization) promote EPS production. To test if responses varied by soil texture, we measured biocrust recovery on two fine-textured soils (clay and sandy clay loam) in a cool desert ecosystem. Shade coupled with inoculum addition resulted in the highest biocrust recovery, especially on clay soils. Independent of rehabilitation strategies, natural recovery of biocrusts occurred more rapidly on clay soils, reflected by greater increases in chlorophyll a (chl a). Chl a, a proxy for cyanobacterial biomass, was correlated to EPS amounts, suggesting that cyanobacteria are significant contributors to EPS production in biocrust development. Despite the role of EPS in biocrust establishment, EPS amounts had negligible effects on soil stability on the fine soil texture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-85
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Arid Environments
Volume163
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2019

Funding

This research was supported by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program ( RC-2329 ), the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department Research Award (CU Boulder), the Beverly Sears Graduate Student Grant Award (CU Boulder), and the USGS Ecosystems and Climate and Land Use Programs . There are no competing interests. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Field and lab support was generously given by Leif Anders, Naomi Lopez, Tyler Turk, Makane Mason, and Ben DeRidder, and statistics support from Amy Churchill. Thank you to the reviewers for their help to improve this manuscript.

Funder number
RC-2329

    Keywords

    • Chlorophyll a
    • Cyanobacteria
    • Exopolysaccharides
    • Restoration
    • Soil stability

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Responses of biological soil crusts to rehabilitation strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this