Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Revitalizing the Debate between Life and Choice: The 2004 March for Women's Lives

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The contemporary U.S. debate over abortion has been waged as a battle between and . The author traces the development of these ideographs, arguing that through their verbal and visual strategies, advocates on both sides of the issue have rendered ideographic meaning concrete. Whereas the fixed definitions have served the cause of well, they have been detrimental for , leading advocates to seek out ways to revitalize the debate. The 2004 March for Women's Lives was a key event in this larger effort; through it, participants revitalized the abortion debate, bringing renewed flexibility to the ideograph at the same time it challenged the fixed status, and the veracity, of the ideograph .
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)111-131
Number of pages21
JournalCommunication and Critical/ Cultural Studies
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 13 2009

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Feminism
  • Ideographs
  • Image Events
  • Images

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revitalizing the Debate between Life and Choice: The 2004 March for Women's Lives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this