Rural community views on the role of local and extralocal interests in public lands governance

Laurie Yung, Michael E. Patterson, Wayne A. Freimund

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    Based on in-depth interviews with residents on the Rocky Mountain Front in Montana, this article examines how disagreements about the appropriate role of local interests influence local conflict over public lands. Residents who advocated that local interests should be privileged framed the conflict in terms of class, social standing, and fairness. While some residents were clearly venue shopping (advocating the level of decision making where they believed they could achieve their goals), others supported the decision-making level they believed to be most democratic. We found that claims for increased local influence were not necessarily tied to support for development of public lands. Antigovernment sentiment was contributing to local resistance of extralocal proposals, and national attention to the area had further entrenched and polarized local views. Disagreement about the decision-making process and the conflation of conflicts over policy process with conflicts over policy outcome made local disputes over public lands particularly intractable.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1170-1186
    Number of pages17
    JournalSociety and Natural Resources
    Issue number12
    StatePublished - Dec 2010


    • Community-based conservation
    • Environmental conflict
    • Public lands policy
    • Rural communities
    • Western environmental values


    Dive into the research topics of 'Rural community views on the role of local and extralocal interests in public lands governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this