TY - JOUR
T1 - Rural Gifted Education and the Effect of Proximity
AU - Puryear, Jeb S.
AU - Kettler, Todd
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © 2017 National Association for Gifted Children.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Gifted education services in rural districts typically lag behind those in nonrural areas. Using district classifications assigned by the National Center for Education Statistics and Texas school district data (n = 1,029) from the Academic Excellence Indicator System, the role of school district classification on gifted education outcomes was investigated. Contextual variables such as school demographics and school size were also examined. The study focused on rural and town school districts which are further classified as fringe, distant, or remote (level of proximity) within those two broad categories. Results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance indicated an effect of proximity for both rural and town districts on both contextual variables and gifted education outcomes. Additionally, rural fringe districts were found to be more similar to districts not classified as rural (i.e., urban, suburban, town) than to rural distant and rural remote districts. Findings offer important implications for both the support for gifted education in rural settings and the usefulness of the census codes as an indicator in educational research.
AB - Gifted education services in rural districts typically lag behind those in nonrural areas. Using district classifications assigned by the National Center for Education Statistics and Texas school district data (n = 1,029) from the Academic Excellence Indicator System, the role of school district classification on gifted education outcomes was investigated. Contextual variables such as school demographics and school size were also examined. The study focused on rural and town school districts which are further classified as fringe, distant, or remote (level of proximity) within those two broad categories. Results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance indicated an effect of proximity for both rural and town districts on both contextual variables and gifted education outcomes. Additionally, rural fringe districts were found to be more similar to districts not classified as rural (i.e., urban, suburban, town) than to rural distant and rural remote districts. Findings offer important implications for both the support for gifted education in rural settings and the usefulness of the census codes as an indicator in educational research.
KW - equity
KW - multivariate analyses
KW - policy/policy analysis
KW - proximity
KW - quantitative methodologies
KW - rural education
KW - special populations/underserved gifted
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014909496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0016986217690229
DO - 10.1177/0016986217690229
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85014909496
SN - 0016-9862
VL - 61
SP - 143
EP - 152
JO - Gifted Child Quarterly
JF - Gifted Child Quarterly
IS - 2
ER -