Abstract
Ghana is one of the developing world's success stories. The first sub-Saharan colony to gain independence, it is a stable democracy experiencing sustained economic growth. Yet as Ghana reaches for the material gains of participation in modern commercial life, its dual legal systems-the system of customary adjudication by traditional authorities and the formal court systemhave come under increasing pressure. New legal developments have truncated the authority of traditional decision-makers, while an overburdened court system lacks the resources to fill the resulting adjudicative gaps. To solve the problem, Ghana is now experimenting with a system of quasi-public dispute resolution, including contractual arbitration and court-connected mediation. If successful, this experiment could provide a model for other emerging democracies seeking to promote greater access to justice while integrating traditional and national adjudicative structures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-126 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Status and Contract in an Emerging Democracy: The Evolution of Dispute Resolution in Ghana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver