Testing the Malthusian model: Population and storage at Housepit 54, Bridge River, British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Considerable debate exists concerning drivers of social change in human societies. One perspective asserts that demographic and economic conditions play a critical role in conditioning human organizational decision-making. Another argument suggests that human agency conditioned by innovative thinking outside of demographic and economic pressures is the more fundamental source of change. The Bridge River site, British Columbia is an optimal locality to explore variable effects of subsistence economy and demography on social change. Previous research indicates that Malthusian processes played important roles in demographic, socio-economic, and political change. This paper presents a test of the Malthusian model drawing data on storage capacity and population size from a single long-lived house within the Bridge River village. Results suggest that household occupants likely experienced two Malthusian periods, persisting through the first but abandoning the house and village during the second. An important implication is that economic and demographic conditions have critical impacts on social process but that specific episodes of collective action also remain dependent upon human agency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-550
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Volume18
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Funding

This research was conducted as a collaborative partnership with Xwísten, the Bridge River Indian Band. We thank in particular, Bradley Jack, Gerald Michel, Susan James, and the many Xwísten members who worked on Housepit 54 in the field context. The 2012-2016 research at Housepit 54 was supported by two grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grants RZ-51287-11 and RZ-230366-1). Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities. The 2008 field season at Bridge River that included test trenches in Housepit 54 was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (grant BCS-0713013). Radiocarbon dating was conducted by DirectAMS (with thanks to Jim Chatters and the late Ugo Zoppi). Maps in Figs. 1 and 2 were drawn respectively by Eric Carlson and Matt Hogan. We thank the many students and volunteers from the University of Montana, Simon Fraser University, Hamilton College, University of Michigan, and University of Notre Dame who participated in field and lab work at Housepit 54. Finally, we thank Bruce Winterhalder, Kevan Edinborough and two anonymous peer reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. We take full responsibility for decisions made regarding content. Prentiss thanks the University of Montana for sabbatical time and travel funding and the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research at the University of Cambridge for providing a Visiting Scholar position.

FundersFunder number
BCS-0713013
National Endowment for the HumanitiesRZ-51287-11, RZ-230366-1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the Malthusian model: Population and storage at Housepit 54, Bridge River, British Columbia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this