Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Constitutionality of State Allocation of Punitive Damage Awards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This Note analyzes state allocation in light of these differing approaches. The constitutional analysis of Part II begins with a discussion of Takings Clause issues presented by the former "appropriation" approach. This section suggests some flaws in that approach and some reasons why courts might mistakenly adopt it. Part II then examines the criminal law protections embodied in the Excessive Fines and Double Jeopardy Clauses and evoked by the latter "civil penalty" approach. Next, Part III argues for specific statutory adoption of the civil penalty approach and discusses the practice and policy issues that that approach presents. Finally, an Appendix cites and summarizes each state allocation statute.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)843-876
Number of pages34
JournalWashington and Lee Law Review
Volume50
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Constitutionality of State Allocation of Punitive Damage Awards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this