TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy of self-paced study in multitrial learning
AU - De Jonge, Mario
AU - Tabbers, Huib K.
AU - Pecher, Diane
AU - Jang, Yoonhee
AU - Zeelenberg, René
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - In 2 experiments we investigated the efficacy of self-paced study in multitrial learning. In Experiment 1, native speakers of English studied lists of Dutch-English word pairs under 1 of 4 imposed fixed presentation rate conditions (24 × 1 s, 12 × 2 s, 6 × 4 s, or 3 × 8 s) and a self-paced study condition. Total study time per list was equated for all conditions. We found that self-paced study resulted in better recall performance than did most of the fixed presentation rates, with the exception of the 12 × 2 s condition, which did not differ from the self-paced condition. Additional correlational analyses suggested that the allocation of more study time to difficult pairs than to easy pairs might be a beneficial strategy for self-paced learning. Experiment 2 was designed to test this hypothesis. In 1 condition, participants studied word pairs in a self-paced fashion without any restrictions. In the other condition, participants studied word pairs in a self-paced fashion but total study time per item was equated. The results showed that allowing self-paced learners to freely allocate study time over items resulted in better recall performance.
AB - In 2 experiments we investigated the efficacy of self-paced study in multitrial learning. In Experiment 1, native speakers of English studied lists of Dutch-English word pairs under 1 of 4 imposed fixed presentation rate conditions (24 × 1 s, 12 × 2 s, 6 × 4 s, or 3 × 8 s) and a self-paced study condition. Total study time per list was equated for all conditions. We found that self-paced study resulted in better recall performance than did most of the fixed presentation rates, with the exception of the 12 × 2 s condition, which did not differ from the self-paced condition. Additional correlational analyses suggested that the allocation of more study time to difficult pairs than to easy pairs might be a beneficial strategy for self-paced learning. Experiment 2 was designed to test this hypothesis. In 1 condition, participants studied word pairs in a self-paced fashion without any restrictions. In the other condition, participants studied word pairs in a self-paced fashion but total study time per item was equated. The results showed that allowing self-paced learners to freely allocate study time over items resulted in better recall performance.
KW - Metacognitive control
KW - Multitrial learning
KW - Self-pacing
KW - Study time allocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946178857&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/xlm0000046
DO - 10.1037/xlm0000046
M3 - Article
C2 - 25133515
AN - SCOPUS:84946178857
SN - 1939-1285
VL - 41
SP - 851
EP - 858
JO - Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
JF - Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
IS - 3
ER -