The magnitude, direction, and tempo of forest change in Greater Yellowstone in a warmer world with more fire

Monica G. Turner, Kristin H. Braziunas, Winslow D. Hansen, Tyler J. Hoecker, Werner Rammer, Zak Ratajczak, A. Leroy Westerling, Rupert Seidl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

As temperatures continue rising, the direction, magnitude, and tempo of change in disturbance-prone forests remain unresolved. Even forests long resilient to stand-replacing fire face uncertain futures, and efforts to project changes in forest structure and composition are sorely needed to anticipate future forest trajectories. We simulated fire (incorporating fuels feedbacks) and forest dynamics on five landscapes spanning the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) to ask the following questions: (1) How and where are forest landscapes likely to change with 21st-century warming and fire activity? (2) Are future forest changes gradual or abrupt, and do forest attributes change synchronously or sequentially? (3) Can forest declines be averted by mid-21st-century stabilization of atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations? We used the spatially explicit individual-based forest model iLand to track multiple attributes (forest extent, stand age, tree density, basal area, aboveground carbon stocks, dominant forest types, species occupancy) through 2100 for six climate scenarios. Hot-dry climate scenarios led to more fire, but stand-replacing fire peaked in mid-century and then declined even as annual area burned continued to rise. Where forest cover persisted, previously dense forests were converted to sparse young woodlands. Increased aridity and fire drove a ratchet of successive abrupt declines (i.e., multiple annual landscape-level changes ≥20%) in tree density, basal area, and extent of older (>150 yr) forests, whereas declines in carbon stocks and mean stand age were always gradual. Forest changes were asynchronous across landscapes, but declines in stand structure always preceded reductions in forest extent and carbon stocks. Forest decline was most likely in less topographically complex landscapes dominated by fire-sensitive tree species (Picea engelmannii, Abies lasiocarpa, Pinus contorta var. latifolia) and where fire resisters (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca) were not already prevalent. If current GHG emissions continue unabated (RCP 8.5) and aridity increases, a suite of forest changes would transform the GYE, with cascading effects on biodiversity and myriad ecosystem services. However, stabilizing GHG concentrations by mid-century (RCP 4.5) would slow the ratchet, moderating fire activity and dampening the magnitude and rate of forest change. Monitoring changes in forest structure may serve as an operational early warning indicator of impending forest decline.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere01485
JournalEcological Monographs
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2022

Funding

We thank Diane Abendroth, Nathan Kiel, Bill Romme, Tanjona Ramiadantsoa, Jason Kaye, and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that improved this paper. We thank Tony Ives for thought‐provoking conversations and the initial R code for detecting abrupt changes in our data. We are grateful for engaging discussions about this research with participants at workshops hosted for regional forest and fire managers and co‐sponsored with the Northern Rockies Fire Science Network in 2017 and 2020. Computing resources via the Center for High Throughput Computing at the University of Wisconsin‐Madison are greatly appreciated. This research was funded by the Joint Fire Science Program (16‐3‐01‐4), the UW2020 Initiative of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, and the University of Wisconsin Vilas Trust. This study also benefits from the support of the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation ( http://www.fpa2.org ) and the Buffalo Bill Center of the West. Author contributions: M. G. Turner, R. Seidl, and A. L. Westerling designed the study; K. H. Braziunas, W. D. Hansen, W. Rammer, and Z. Ratajczak generated data, developed code, and parameterized the model; A. L. Westerling produced the climate–fire models; Z. Ratajczak performed the model simulations; M. G. Turner, K. H. Braziunas, T. J. Hoecker, Z. Ratajczak, and R. Seidl analyzed results; M. G. Turner wrote the paper with input from all co‐authors.

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The magnitude, direction, and tempo of forest change in Greater Yellowstone in a warmer world with more fire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this