Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index

  • Gabriella Agazie
  • , Akash Anumarlapudi
  • , Anne M. Archibald
  • , Zaven Arzoumanian
  • , Jeremy G. Baier
  • , Paul T. Baker
  • , Bence Bécsy
  • , Laura Blecha
  • , Adam Brazier
  • , Paul R. Brook
  • , Sarah Burke-Spolaor
  • , J. Andrew Casey-Clyde
  • , Maria Charisi
  • , Shami Chatterjee
  • , Tyler Cohen
  • , James M. Cordes
  • , Neil J. Cornish
  • , Fronefield Crawford
  • , H. Thankful Cromartie
  • , Kathryn Crowter
  • Megan E. DeCesar, Paul B. Demorest, Heling Deng, Lankeswar Dey, Timothy Dolch, David Esmyol, Elizabeth C. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabriel E. Freedman, Emiko C. Gardiner, Nate Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Kyle A. Gersbach, Joseph Glaser, Deborah C. Good, Kayhan Gültekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron D. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey S. Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, William G. Lamb, Bjorn Larsen, Joseph T.W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Rafael R. Lino dos Santos, Tingting Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jing Luo, Ryan S. Lynch, Chung Pei Ma, Dustin R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, James W. McKee, Maura A. McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, Bradley W. Meyers, Patrick M. Meyers, Chiara M.F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, Stella Koch Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge B.P. Perera, Nihan S. Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Jessie C. Runnoe, Alexander Saffer, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann Schmiedekamp, Carl Schmiedekamp, Kai Schmitz, Tobias Schröder, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena S. Siwek, Sophia V. Sosa Fiscella, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Stephen R. Taylor, Jacob E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Rutger van Haasteren, Sarah J. Vigeland, Richard von Eckardstein, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, David Wright, Olivia Young
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • Newcastle University
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • Oregon State University
  • Widener University
  • University of Florida
  • Cornell University
  • University of Birmingham
  • West Virginia University
  • University of Connecticut
  • Vanderbilt University
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
  • Montana State University
  • Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster
  • National Research Council
  • University of British Columbia
  • George Mason University
  • National Science Foundation
  • Hillsdale College
  • Eureka Scientific, Inc.
  • University of Münster
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Naval Research Laboratory
  • University of Washington
  • SETI Institute
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Yale University
  • SUNY Oswego
  • National Centre for Nuclear Research
  • University of Toronto
  • University of the Pacific
  • University of Hull
  • German Electron Synchrotron
  • Lafayette College
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Tufts University
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • Texas Tech University
  • University of Puerto Rico
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Harvard & Smithsonian
  • Oberlin College
  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute)
  • Middle East Technical University
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • Bogazici University
  • Northwestern University
  • Adler Planetarium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The NANOGrav 15 yr data provide compelling evidence for a stochastic gravitational-wave (GW) background at nanohertz frequencies. The simplest model-independent approach to characterizing the frequency spectrum of this signal consists of a simple power-law fit involving two parameters: an amplitude A and a spectral index γ. In this Letter, we consider the next logical step beyond this minimal spectral model, allowing for a running (i.e., logarithmic frequency dependence) of the spectral index, grun (f ) = g + b ln (f /fref ). We fit this running-power-law (RPL) model to the NANOGrav 15 yr data and perform a Bayesian model comparison with the minimal constant-power-law (CPL) model, which results in a 95% credible interval for the parameter β consistent with no running, b Î [-0.80, 2.96], and an inconclusive Bayes factor, B(RPL versus CPL) = 0.69 ± 0.01. We thus conclude that, at present, the minimal CPL model still suffices to adequately describe the NANOGrav signal; however, future data sets may well lead to a measurement of nonzero β. Finally, we interpret the RPL model as a description of primordial GWs generated during cosmic inflation, which allows us to combine our results with upper limits from Big Bang nucleosynthesis, the cosmic microwave background, and LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberL29
JournalAstrophysical Journal Letters
Volume978
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 10 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Running of the Spectral Index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this