Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Gravitational-wave Memory

  • Gabriella Agazie
  • , Akash Anumarlapudi
  • , Anne M. Archibald
  • , Zaven Arzoumanian
  • , Jeremy G. Baier
  • , Paul T. Baker
  • , Bence Bécsy
  • , Laura Blecha
  • , Adam Brazier
  • , Paul R. Brook
  • , Sarah Burke-Spolaor
  • , Rand Burnette
  • , J. Andrew Casey-Clyde
  • , Maria Charisi
  • , Shami Chatterjee
  • , Tyler Cohen
  • , James M. Cordes
  • , Neil J. Cornish
  • , Fronefield Crawford
  • , H. Thankful Cromartie
  • Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul B. Demorest, Heling Deng, Lankeswar Dey, Timothy Dolch, Elizabeth C. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabriel E. Freedman, Emiko C. Gardiner, Nate Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Kyle A. Gersbach, Joseph Glaser, Deborah C. Good, Kayhan Gültekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron D. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey S. Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, William G. Lamb, Bjorn Larsen, T. Joseph W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tingting Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jing Luo, Ryan S. Lynch, Chung Pei Ma, Dustin R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, James W. McKee, Maura A. McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, Bradley W. Meyers, Patrick M. Meyers, Chiara M.F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Priyamvada Natarajan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, Stella Koch Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge B.P. Perera, Polina Petrov, Nihan S. Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Jessie C. Runnoe, Alexander Saffer, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann Schmiedekamp, Carl Schmiedekamp, Kai Schmitz, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena S. Siwek, Sophia V.Sosa Fiscella, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Jerry P. Sun, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob Taylor, Stephen R. Taylor, Jacob E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Rutger van Haasteren, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, David Wright, Olivia Young
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • Newcastle University
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • Oregon State University
  • Widener University
  • University of Florida
  • Cornell University
  • University of Birmingham
  • West Virginia University
  • University of Connecticut
  • Vanderbilt University
  • New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
  • Montana State University
  • Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster
  • National Research Council
  • University of British Columbia
  • George Mason University
  • National Science Foundation
  • Hillsdale College
  • Eureka Scientific, Inc.
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • California Institute of Technology
  • Naval Research Laboratory
  • University of Washington
  • SETI Institute
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Yale University
  • SUNY Oswego
  • University of Toronto
  • University of the Pacific
  • Union College
  • German Electron Synchrotron
  • Harvard University
  • Lafayette College
  • Carnegie Institution of Washington
  • Tufts University
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • Texas Tech University
  • University of Puerto Rico
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • University of Münster
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Harvard & Smithsonian
  • Oberlin College
  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute)
  • Middle East Technical University
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • Bogazici University
  • Northwestern University
  • Adler Planetarium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present the results of a search for nonlinear gravitational-wave (GW) memory in the NANOGrav 15 yr data set. We find no significant evidence for memory signals in the data set, with a maximum Bayes factor of 3.1 in favor of a model including memory. We therefore place upper limits on the strain of potential GW memory events as a function of sky location and observing epoch. We find upper limits that are not always more constraining than previous NANOGrav results. We show that it is likely due to the increase in common red noise between the 12.5 and 15 yr NANOGrav data sets.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume987
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Gravitational-wave Memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this