Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: A Case Study for Simplified Dispersion Measure Modeling for PSR J1455−3330 and the Impact on Gravitational Wave Sensitivity

  • Michael T. Lam
  • , David L. Kaplan
  • , Gabriella Agazie
  • , Akash Anumarlapudi
  • , Anne M. Archibald
  • , Zaven Arzoumanian
  • , Paul T. Baker
  • , Paul R. Brook
  • , Olivia A. Combs
  • , H. Thankful Cromartie
  • , Kathryn Crowter
  • , Megan E. DeCesar
  • , Paul B. Demorest
  • , Timothy Dolch
  • , Elizabeth C. Ferrara
  • , William Fiore
  • , Emmanuel Fonseca
  • , Gabriel E. Freedman
  • , Nate Garver-Daniels
  • , Peter A. Gentile
  • Joseph Glaser, Deborah C. Good, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Ross J. Jennings, Megan L. Jones, Matthew Kerr, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jing Luo, Ryan S. Lynch, Alexander McEwen, Maura A. McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, Bradley W. Meyers, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge B.P. Perera, Nihan S. Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Ann Schmiedekamp, Carl Schmiedekamp, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Joseph Simon, Ingrid H. Stairs, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Haley M. Wahl
  • SETI Institute
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Newcastle University
  • NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • Widener University
  • University of Birmingham
  • Lafayette College
  • National Academy of Sciences
  • University of British Columbia
  • George Mason University
  • National Science Foundation
  • Hillsdale College
  • Eureka Scientific, Inc.
  • University of Maryland, College Park
  • West Virginia University
  • Oregon State University
  • Naval Research Laboratory
  • University of Toronto
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Curtin University
  • Eötvös Loránd University
  • Texas Tech University
  • University of Puerto Rico
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Evidence for a low-frequency gravitational-wave background using pulsar timing arrays has generated recent interest in its underlying contributing sources. However, multiple investigations have seen that the significance of the evidence does not change with the choice of pulsar modeling techniques, but the resulting parameters from the gravitational wave searches do. PSR J1455−3330 is one of the longest-observed pulsars in the array monitored by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav), but showed no evidence for long-timescale red noise, either intrinsic or the common signal found among many pulsars in the array. In this work, we argue that NANOGrav’s piecewise-constant function used to model variations in radio-frequency-dependent dispersive delay should not be used for this pulsar, and a much simpler physical model of a fixed solar wind density plus a linear or quadratic trend in dispersion measure is preferred. When the original model is replaced, (i) the pulsar’s timing parallax signal changes from an upper limit to a significant detection, (ii) red noise becomes significant, and (iii) the red noise is consistent with the common signal found for the other pulsars. Neither of these signals is radio-frequency dependent. While the same physical motivation will not apply to many of the pulsars currently used in pulsar timing arrays, we argue for careful, physically motivated timing and noise modeling of pulsars used in precision timing experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number118
JournalAstrophysical Journal
Volume1004
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 10 2026

Keywords

  • Gravitational wave astronomy (675)
  • Interstellar medium (847)
  • Millisecond pulsars (1062)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: A Case Study for Simplified Dispersion Measure Modeling for PSR J1455−3330 and the Impact on Gravitational Wave Sensitivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this