Abstract
Asset ownership is frequently used to assess the welfare status of households in rural areas of developing countries. Researchers often want to know the prior status of households or how that status has changed over time. In a case study in the Brazilian Amazon, we compare recall data with contemporary reports on assets from a panel survey. We consider multiple dimensions of the consistency of retrospective and contemporary data and seek to identify characteristics that lead to more accurate recall. We find that although retrospective data provide some information on past assets owned by households, they do not provide a highly accurate measure of either individual asset ownership or counts of types of assets owned. Consistent with previous studies, we find that items with greater salience are recalled more accurately. We also find that wealthier households exhibit upward bias when recalling assets owned in a previous period.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 223-238 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Field Methods |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2014 |
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: funding from the USDA Forest Service International Programs, the Amazon Institute for People and the Environment (IMAZON), and the National Science Foundation (grant #0752904). We thank (without implicating) Jill Caviglia-Harris and Dan Harris for helpful suggestions. Cody Burnett assisted with data processing. We are grateful for funding from the USDA Forest Service International Programs, the Amazon Institute for People and the Environment (IMAZON), and the National Science Foundation (grant #0752904).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| IMAZON | |
| 0752904 |
Keywords
- Brazil
- asset ownership
- household survey
- recall data