TY - JOUR
T1 - Three fuel models for predicting urban fire spread – a stopgap for emergency management in the US
AU - Moran, Christopher J.
AU - Seielstad, Carl A.
AU - Pietruszka, Bradley M.
N1 - © 2025 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of IAWF.
PY - 2025/10/27
Y1 - 2025/10/27
N2 - Background: Prevailing American wildland fire modelling systems fail to predict fire growth in urban areas due to the absence of burnable urban fuels. Aims: This research aims to identify fuel models that optimise fire spread in urban areas relative to a hypothetical fire spread model derived from observations of recent urban fires. Methods: A target Rate of Spread (RoS) is derived from observations of seven urban conflagrations to anchor the model to absolute RoS. Exhaustive parameter sweeps are used to identify combinations of fuel variables that result in optimal performance. Key results: The target RoS is 0.81 km/h. Parameter sweeps converge on unique sets of fuel parameters including (1) BU0, an unconstrained custom fuel model; (2) BU1, a custom fuel model that operates within the constraints of current US modelling systems; and (3) Anderson Fuel Model 9, a best-performing standard fuel model. Conclusions & implications: Although this approach stretches current modelling systems beyond their intended design, the resultant fuel models provide a necessary stopgap for emergency management until urban-specific fire spread models find their way into operational use.
AB - Background: Prevailing American wildland fire modelling systems fail to predict fire growth in urban areas due to the absence of burnable urban fuels. Aims: This research aims to identify fuel models that optimise fire spread in urban areas relative to a hypothetical fire spread model derived from observations of recent urban fires. Methods: A target Rate of Spread (RoS) is derived from observations of seven urban conflagrations to anchor the model to absolute RoS. Exhaustive parameter sweeps are used to identify combinations of fuel variables that result in optimal performance. Key results: The target RoS is 0.81 km/h. Parameter sweeps converge on unique sets of fuel parameters including (1) BU0, an unconstrained custom fuel model; (2) BU1, a custom fuel model that operates within the constraints of current US modelling systems; and (3) Anderson Fuel Model 9, a best-performing standard fuel model. Conclusions & implications: Although this approach stretches current modelling systems beyond their intended design, the resultant fuel models provide a necessary stopgap for emergency management until urban-specific fire spread models find their way into operational use.
KW - Rate of Spread
KW - Rothermel
KW - United States
KW - conflagration
KW - emergency management
KW - fire behaviour fuel model
KW - fire behaviour modelling
KW - fire modelling system
KW - urban fire
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022729883
U2 - 10.1071/WF24132
DO - 10.1071/WF24132
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105022729883
SN - 1049-8001
VL - 34
JO - International Journal of Wildland Fire
JF - International Journal of Wildland Fire
IS - 11
ER -