Trophic interactions among algal blooms, macroinvertebrates, and brown trout: Implications for trout recovery in a restored river

  • Marc Peipoch
  • , Herbert Maurice Valett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Positive correlation between trout abundance and dissolved metal concentrations along the Upper Clark Fork River (UCFR; Montana, USA) have forced restoration practitioners to seek underlying causes of reduced fish density beyond heavy metal contamination. Throughout the river, nutrient enrichment and summer algal blooms may be hindering full recovery of trout populations. In this study, we evaluated the community structure and metal body burdens of benthic invertebrates and characterized existing trophic linkages between brown trout and dominant invertebrate taxa before and during summer algal blooms in a downstream reach of the UCFR where fish densities are low (20–30 trout/km), and where metal contamination is relevant but minimal compared with upstream. In spring, estimated invertebrate abundance was 1,727 ± 217 individuals/m2 and dominated by Ephemerellidae and Baetidae families. During summer algal bloom, invertebrate abundance increased 15-fold (20,580 ± 3,510 individuals/m2) mostly due to greater abundance of Chironomidae, Hydropsychidae, and Simulidae. Copper body burdens (130 ± 42 ppm) were higher than any other heavy metal regardless of season, but detectable concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead were also found. A Bayesian mixing model combining metal burdens and stable isotopes showed that in the spring, trout of average size (355 ± 65 g) relied mostly on epibenthic taxa (Ephemerellidae and Hydropsychidae), contrasting with small (<100 g) and large (>400 g) trout relying heavily on Baetidae, a major component of invertebrate drift. Foraging segregation related to trout size did not occur during summer algal blooms, which may reflect increasing influence of benthic algal proliferation or indicate the indiscriminate use of pool habitats as thermal refugia over summer conditions by trout of different ages.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1563-1574
Number of pages12
JournalRiver Research and Applications
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Funding

The authors are grateful to P. Davis and N. Banish for field assistance and K. Bray for laboratory assistance. N. Cook provided guidance on historical trout data and fish collection. We thank the two anonymous reviewers whose comments/suggestions helped improve and clarify this manuscript. This research was financially supported by National Science Foundation EPSCoR Track-1 EPS-1101342 (INSTEP 3) through the Montana Institute on Ecosystems to HM Valett, by Natural Resource Damage Program Contract 900017 Task Order 2.42 to HM Valett, and by the NSF LTREB programme (DEB 1655197) to H. M. Valett and M. Peipoch.

Funder number
Track-1 EPS-1101342
1655197, 1655198, DEB 1655197, 1757351
900017

    Keywords

    • brown trout
    • heavy metal pollution
    • river food webs
    • river restoration
    • riverine algal blooms
    • trophic interactions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Trophic interactions among algal blooms, macroinvertebrates, and brown trout: Implications for trout recovery in a restored river'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this