Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Tropospheric ozone assessment report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100

  • A. T. Archibald
  • , J. L. Neu
  • , Y. F. Elshorbany
  • , O. R. Cooper
  • , P. J. Young
  • , H. Akiyoshi
  • , R. A. Cox
  • , M. Coyle
  • , R. G. Derwent
  • , M. Deushi
  • , A. Finco
  • , G. J. Frost
  • , I. E. Galbally
  • , G. Gerosa
  • , C. Granier
  • , P. T. Griffiths
  • , R. Hossaini
  • , L. Hu
  • , P. Jöckel
  • , B. Josse
  • M. Y. Lin, M. Mertens, O. Morgenstern, M. Naja, V. Naik, S. Oltmans, D. A. Plummer, L. E. Revell, A. Saiz-Lopez, P. Saxena, Y. M. Shin, I. Shahid, D. Shallcross, S. Tilmes, T. Trickl, T. J. Wallington, T. Wang, H. M. Worden, G. Zeng
  • University of Cambridge
  • National Centre for Atmospheric Science
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  • University of South Florida
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • Lancaster University
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
  • The James Hutton Institute
  • Rdscientific
  • Japan Meteorological Agency
  • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
  • CSIRO
  • University of Wollongong
  • Université de Toulouse
  • German Aerospace Center
  • Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
  • Princeton University
  • NIWA
  • Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences
  • Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • University of Canterbury
  • CSIC - Institute of Physical Chemistry Rocasolano
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University
  • Institute of Space Technology
  • University of Bristol
  • National Center for Atmospheric Research
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  • Ford Motor Company
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

122 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our understanding of the processes that control the burden and budget of tropospheric ozone has changed dramatically over the last 60 years. Models are the key tools used to understand these changes, and these underscore that there are many processes important in controlling the tropospheric ozone budget. In this critical review, we assess our evolving understanding of these processes, both physical and chemical. We review model simulations from the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and Chemistry Climate Modelling Initiative to assess the changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and its budget from 1850 to 2010. Analysis of these data indicates that there has been significant growth in the ozone burden from 1850 to 2000 (approximately 43 + 9%) but smaller growth between 1960 and 2000 (approximately 16 + 10%) and that the models simulate burdens of ozone well within recent satellite estimates. The Chemistry Climate Modelling Initiative model ozone budgets indicate that the net chemical production of ozone in the troposphere plateaued in the 1990s and has not changed since then inspite of increases in the burden. There has been a shift in net ozone production in the troposphere being greatest in the northern mid and high latitudes to the northern tropics, driven by the regional evolution of precursor emissions. An analysis of the evolution of tropospheric ozone through the 21st century, as simulated by Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 models, reveals a large source of uncertainty associated with models themselves (i.e., in the way that they simulate the chemical and physical processes that control tropospheric ozone). This structural uncertainty is greatest in the near term (two to three decades), but emissions scenarios dominate uncertainty in the longer term (2050–2100) evolution of tropospheric ozone. This intrinsic model uncertainty prevents robust predictions of near-term changes in the tropospheric ozone burden, and we review how progress can be made to reduce this limitation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number034
JournalElementa
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 30 2020

Funding

ATA and PTG would like to acknowledge support from National Centre for Atmospheric Science. YE would like to acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences awards # 1900795 and 1929368. TW acknowledges support from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (T24-504/17-N) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91844301). ASL thanks European Executive Agency under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research Innovation programme (Project “ERC-2016-COG 726349 CLIMAHAL”). RH is supported by an NERC Independent Research Fellowship (NE/N014375/1). YMS is supported by an NERC PhD studentship. Part of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. ATA and PTG would like to acknowledge support from National Centre for Atmospheric Science. YE would like to acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences awards # 1900795 and 1929368. TW acknowledges support from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (T24-504/17-N) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (91844301). ASL thanks European Executive Agency under the European Union?s Horizon 2020 Research Innovation programme (Project ?ERC-2016-COG 726349 CLIMAHAL?). RH is supported by an NERC Independent Research Fellowship (NE/N014375/1). YMS is supported by an NERC PhD studentship. Part of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

FundersFunder number
1929368, 1900795
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
726349
Natural Environment Research CouncilNE/N014375/1
National Centre for Atmospheric Science
National Natural Science Foundation of China91844301
T24-504/17-N

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Chemistry transport models
    • Ozone
    • Ozone budget
    • Tropospheric chemistry
    • Tropospheric ozone

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tropospheric ozone assessment report: A critical review of changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and budget from 1850 to 2100'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this