Understanding and responding to challenges students face when engaging in carbon cycle pool-and-flux reasoning

Beth A. Covitt, Joyce M. Parker, Craig Kohn, May Lee, Qinyun Lin, Charles W. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Carbon cycle pool-and-flux reasoning is a critical facet of climate literacy. This article begins with discussion of why this type of reasoning is both challenging and important. Results from two studies are reported. The first describes students’ approaches to carbon cycle pool-and-flux reasoning. The second describes and reports results from an instructional intervention designed to scaffold secondary students’ model-based pool-and-flux reasoning. Before instruction, most secondary students employed informal reasoning approaches including good versus bad and correlation heuristics to carbon cycle pool-and-flux problems. After instruction, the portion of students employing goal model-based pool-and-flux reasoning increased from 27 to 52 percent. This study builds on previous and current research to offer a promising instructional approach to scaffolding improvements in students’ model-based pool-and-flux reasoning. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1847882.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-117
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Environmental Education
Volume52
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Keywords

  • carbon cycle curriculum
  • carbon cycle pool-and-flux reasoning
  • climate literacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding and responding to challenges students face when engaging in carbon cycle pool-and-flux reasoning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this