Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements

  • Jonathan R. Potts
  • , Luca Börger
  • , Marlee A. Tucker
  • , Federico Ossi
  • , Scott W. Yanco
  • , Diego Ellis-Soto
  • , Thomas Müller
  • , Ruth Y. Oliver
  • , Mario H. Alves
  • , Walter Arnold
  • , Nina Attias
  • , Guillaume Bastille-Rousseau
  • , Jerrold L. Belant
  • , J. David Blount
  • , Dean E. Beyer
  • , Francesca Cagnacci
  • , Simon Chamaillé-Jammes
  • , Aung N. Chan
  • , Eric K. Cole
  • , Jessica S. Cornils
  • Rogerio Cunha de Paula, Vickie DeNicola, Arnaud L.J. Desbiez, Sarah R. Dewey, David Drake, Michael Egan, Jasper A.J. Eikelboom, Morgan Farmer, Mathieu Garel, Jacob R. Goheen, Hans Peter Hansen, Lars Haugaard, Mark Hebblewhite, Morten Heim, Miloš Ježek, Lilla Jordán, Douglas N. Kamaru, Miha Krofel, Tayler N. LaSharr, Peter Leimgruber, Anne Loison, Ryan A. Long, Matthias Claudio Loretto, Pascal Marchand, Erling Meisingset, Joerg Melzheimer, Kevin L. Monteith, John J. Morgan, Rasmus M. Mortensen, Rebekka Mueller, Atle Mysterud, Astrid Olejarz, Teresa Oliveira, Manuela Panzacchi, Ruben Portas, Hubert Potočnik, Herbert H.T. Prins, Laura R. Prugh, Nathan Ranc, Ralf Roeder, Christer M. Rolandsen, Çağan Şekercioğlu, Aldin Selimovic, Rachel Smiley, Erling Johan Solberg, Olav Strand, Peter Sunde, Carole Toïgo, Bram Van Moorter, Tana L. Verzuh, Bettina Wachter, Brittany L. Wagler, Jesse Whittington, Christopher C. Wilmers, George Wittemyer, Christian Rutz
  • University of Sheffield
  • Swansea University
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Istituto Agrario San Michele all'Adige
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Yale University
  • Frankfurt Am Main
  • Goethe University Frankfurt
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • University of Bari
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
  • Southern Illinois University
  • Michigan State University
  • University of Utah
  • Université de Montpellier
  • University of Pretoria
  • Colorado State University
  • United States Fish & Wildlife Service
  • Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
  • Royal Zoological Society of Scotland
  • IPÊ (Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas; Institute for Ecological Research)
  • U.S. Department of the Interior
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Iowa State University
  • Aarhus University
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research
  • University of Ljubljana
  • University of Wyoming
  • Université Savoie Mont Blanc
  • University of Idaho
  • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • University of Oslo
  • University of Washington
  • Université de Toulouse
  • Koc University
  • Parks Canada
  • University of St Andrews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Anthropogenic land conversion is putting increasing pressure on wildlife populations around the world. To mitigate impacts, it is necessary to develop a detailed mechanistic understanding of how animals are affected by different types of human activity. A key challenge is to disentangle the effects of static infrastructure, like roads or buildings, and the presence of humans in the landscape. To address this question, we examined if terrestrial mammals altered their movement behaviour around buildings in response to reduced human mobility during COVID-19 lockdowns. We compiled GPS tracking data from 35 study sites across five continents, for 10 carnivore species and 13 herbivore species, totalling >1 million location records from 586 individuals. For each study, we used integrated step selection analysis to test the extent to which animals changed their avoidance of buildings as lockdown took effect, leveraging the recently released Microsoft MLBuildings dataset of global building locations. Analysis of population-level effects revealed that, in areas with high Human Footprint Index (HFI), animals tended to show a significant reduction in their avoidance of buildings during lockdown, but not in low HFI areas. No such trend was detected during equivalent periods in years other than 2020, indicating that behavioural changes were a result of reduced human mobility during lockdowns. Overall, our findings suggest that animals living alongside humans exhibit greater plasticity when people change their behaviour, likely indicating the combined effects of environmental filtering and habituation. More generally, our study provides a critical first step towards developing evidence-based tools for forecasting how wildlife movement behaviour may change in response to different land-use strategies, human activities, conservation interventions or environmental perturbations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • GPS tracking
  • anthropause
  • bio-logging
  • human–wildlife coexistence
  • step selection
  • sustainability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this