Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective

Jamie D. Collins; Klaus Uhlenbruck; Peter Rodriguez

doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3

Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective

Jamie D. Collins, Klaus Uhlenbruck, Peter Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

201 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study builds upon the top management literature to predict and test antecedents to firms' engagement in corruption. Building on a survey of 341 executives in India, we find that if executives have social ties with government officials, their firms are more likely to engage in corruption. Further, these executives are likely to rationalize engaging in corruption as a necessity for being competitive. The results collectively illustrate the role that executives' social ties and perceptions have in shaping illegal actions of their respective firms.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	89-108
Number of pages	20
Journal	Journal of Business Ethics
Volume	87
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3
State	Published - Jun 2009

Keywords

Corruption
India
Rationalization
Social ties

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3

Cite this

@article{e639eccf4f78469bb09ee729bbb754be,

title = "Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective",

abstract = "This study builds upon the top management literature to predict and test antecedents to firms' engagement in corruption. Building on a survey of 341 executives in India, we find that if executives have social ties with government officials, their firms are more likely to engage in corruption. Further, these executives are likely to rationalize engaging in corruption as a necessity for being competitive. The results collectively illustrate the role that executives' social ties and perceptions have in shaping illegal actions of their respective firms.",

keywords = "Corruption, India, Rationalization, Social ties",

author = "Collins, {Jamie D.} and Klaus Uhlenbruck and Peter Rodriguez",

note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Bert Cannella, Stewart Miller, Rajan Varadarajan, seminar participants at Arizona State University, Instituto de Empresa and participants of the 2005 JIBS Paper Development Workshop for valuable insights and the Center for International Business Studies and Mays Business School at Texas AandM University for financial support. An earlier version was published in the Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management.",

year = "2009",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3",

language = "English",

volume = "87",

pages = "89--108",

journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",

issn = "0167-4544",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why firms engage in corruption

T2 - A top management perspective

AU - Collins, Jamie D.

AU - Uhlenbruck, Klaus

AU - Rodriguez, Peter

N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Bert Cannella, Stewart Miller, Rajan Varadarajan, seminar participants at Arizona State University, Instituto de Empresa and participants of the 2005 JIBS Paper Development Workshop for valuable insights and the Center for International Business Studies and Mays Business School at Texas AandM University for financial support. An earlier version was published in the Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management.

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - This study builds upon the top management literature to predict and test antecedents to firms' engagement in corruption. Building on a survey of 341 executives in India, we find that if executives have social ties with government officials, their firms are more likely to engage in corruption. Further, these executives are likely to rationalize engaging in corruption as a necessity for being competitive. The results collectively illustrate the role that executives' social ties and perceptions have in shaping illegal actions of their respective firms.

AB - This study builds upon the top management literature to predict and test antecedents to firms' engagement in corruption. Building on a survey of 341 executives in India, we find that if executives have social ties with government officials, their firms are more likely to engage in corruption. Further, these executives are likely to rationalize engaging in corruption as a necessity for being competitive. The results collectively illustrate the role that executives' social ties and perceptions have in shaping illegal actions of their respective firms.

KW - Corruption

KW - India

KW - Rationalization

KW - Social ties

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349244005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3

DO - 10.1007/s10551-008-9872-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:67349244005

SN - 0167-4544

VL - 87

SP - 89

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

IS - 1

ER -

Why firms engage in corruption: A top management perspective

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this