TY - JOUR
T1 - Win-win for wind and wildlife
T2 - A vision to facilitate sustainable development
AU - Kiesecker, Joseph M.
AU - Evans, Jeffrey S.
AU - Fargione, Joe
AU - Doherty, Kevin
AU - Foresman, Kerry R.
AU - Kunz, Thomas H.
AU - Naugle, Dave
AU - Nibbelink, Nathan P.
AU - Niemuth, Neal D.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Wind energy offers the potential to reduce carbon emissions while increasing energy independence and bolstering economic development. However, wind energy has a larger land footprint per Gigawatt (GW) than most other forms of energy production, making appropriate siting and mitigation particularly important. Species that require large unfragmented habitats and those known to avoid vertical structures are particularly at risk from wind development. Developing energy on disturbed lands rather than placing new developments within large and intact habitats would reduce cumulative impacts to wildlife. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that it will take 241 GW of terrestrial based wind development on approximately 5 million hectares to reach 20% electricity production for the U.S. by 2030. We estimate there are ~7,700 GW of potential wind energy available across the U.S., with ~3,500 GW on disturbed lands. In addition, a disturbance-focused development strategy would avert the development of ~2.3 million hectares of undisturbed lands while generating the same amount of energy as development based solely on maximizing wind potential. Wind subsidies targeted at favoring low-impact developments and creating avoidance and mitigation requirements that raise the costs for projects impacting sensitive lands could improve public value for both wind energy and biodiversity conservation.
AB - Wind energy offers the potential to reduce carbon emissions while increasing energy independence and bolstering economic development. However, wind energy has a larger land footprint per Gigawatt (GW) than most other forms of energy production, making appropriate siting and mitigation particularly important. Species that require large unfragmented habitats and those known to avoid vertical structures are particularly at risk from wind development. Developing energy on disturbed lands rather than placing new developments within large and intact habitats would reduce cumulative impacts to wildlife. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that it will take 241 GW of terrestrial based wind development on approximately 5 million hectares to reach 20% electricity production for the U.S. by 2030. We estimate there are ~7,700 GW of potential wind energy available across the U.S., with ~3,500 GW on disturbed lands. In addition, a disturbance-focused development strategy would avert the development of ~2.3 million hectares of undisturbed lands while generating the same amount of energy as development based solely on maximizing wind potential. Wind subsidies targeted at favoring low-impact developments and creating avoidance and mitigation requirements that raise the costs for projects impacting sensitive lands could improve public value for both wind energy and biodiversity conservation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954577492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0017566
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0017566
M3 - Article
C2 - 21533285
AN - SCOPUS:79954577492
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 6
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 4
M1 - e17566
ER -