TY - JOUR
T1 - Within-sample variation of fecal glucocorticoid measurements
AU - Millspaugh, Joshua J.
AU - Washburn, Brian E.
N1 - Funding Information:
A University of Missouri (MU) Research Board Grant, a MU Life Science Mission Enhancement Postdoctoral Fellowship, and the MU Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences provided financial and logistical support for this project. Fecal glucocorticoid assays were conducted in the Wildlife Stress Physiology Laboratory in the MU Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences. The Missouri Department of Conservation Research Center provided white-tailed deer housing facilities. J. Beringer and L. Hansen helped manage these captive facilities and we appreciate their support. We thank J. Sumners, T. Mong, C. Rittenhouse, B. Woeck, and A. Knox for their assistance in collecting the fecal samples and sample processing in the laboratory. G. Chambers graciously provided access to hand-raised deer and we appreciate his cooperation. R. Gitzen and M. Larson provided helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was approved by the MU Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No. 3581).
PY - 2003/6/1
Y1 - 2003/6/1
N2 - Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite analysis is a useful tool for monitoring adrenocortical activity in captive and free-ranging wildlife. Glucocorticoid metabolites may not be evenly distributed within fecal samples and this variability could affect the interpretation of glucocorticoid metabolite measurements. Furthermore, the precision (i.e., repeatability of measurements) of fecal glucocorticoid measurements from well-mixed samples is unknown. We collected fresh white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) feces at various times pre- and post-adrenocorticotropin injection to provide samples with low (<75ng/g), medium (75-90ng/g), and high (>90ng/g) glucocorticoid concentrations in case variability differs in samples of dissimilar hormone metabolite concentrations. We compared two sampling methods (selection of three pellet groups [one from each end of the fecal mass and one from the center] versus sampling three small portions of the thoroughly mixed fecal mass) to estimate within-sample variation of glucocorticoid metabolites. Glucocorticoid metabolite measures from pellet groups were higher than fecal glucocorticoid measures from mixed samples in the low (F=3.10; df = 1,56; P=0.08) and medium concentration (F=7.28; df = 1,50; P=0.01) groups. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite estimates from mixed samples were less variable than glucocorticoid metabolite measures using pellet groups from the same fecal mass, although these differences were not statistically significant (low group: F=0.59; df = 1,38; P=0.45; medium group: F=0.13; df = 1,34; P=0.72; high group: F=2.30; df = 1,28; P=0.14). The mean coefficient of variation was <10% across all treatment groups and sampling methods. However, a power analysis indicated the mixed sub-sample technique requires fewer samples to detect statistically significant differences than pellet groups. Our results suggest that glucocorticoid metabolites may not be evenly distributed in white-tailed deer feces. Consequently, using only a few pellets from a fecal mass may bias assay interpretation. We suggest researchers homogenize the entire fecal mass before removing a sub-sample of fecal material for analysis. Also, other sources of variation must be considered when interpreting results of fecal glucocorticoid studies.
AB - Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite analysis is a useful tool for monitoring adrenocortical activity in captive and free-ranging wildlife. Glucocorticoid metabolites may not be evenly distributed within fecal samples and this variability could affect the interpretation of glucocorticoid metabolite measurements. Furthermore, the precision (i.e., repeatability of measurements) of fecal glucocorticoid measurements from well-mixed samples is unknown. We collected fresh white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) feces at various times pre- and post-adrenocorticotropin injection to provide samples with low (<75ng/g), medium (75-90ng/g), and high (>90ng/g) glucocorticoid concentrations in case variability differs in samples of dissimilar hormone metabolite concentrations. We compared two sampling methods (selection of three pellet groups [one from each end of the fecal mass and one from the center] versus sampling three small portions of the thoroughly mixed fecal mass) to estimate within-sample variation of glucocorticoid metabolites. Glucocorticoid metabolite measures from pellet groups were higher than fecal glucocorticoid measures from mixed samples in the low (F=3.10; df = 1,56; P=0.08) and medium concentration (F=7.28; df = 1,50; P=0.01) groups. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite estimates from mixed samples were less variable than glucocorticoid metabolite measures using pellet groups from the same fecal mass, although these differences were not statistically significant (low group: F=0.59; df = 1,38; P=0.45; medium group: F=0.13; df = 1,34; P=0.72; high group: F=2.30; df = 1,28; P=0.14). The mean coefficient of variation was <10% across all treatment groups and sampling methods. However, a power analysis indicated the mixed sub-sample technique requires fewer samples to detect statistically significant differences than pellet groups. Our results suggest that glucocorticoid metabolites may not be evenly distributed in white-tailed deer feces. Consequently, using only a few pellets from a fecal mass may bias assay interpretation. We suggest researchers homogenize the entire fecal mass before removing a sub-sample of fecal material for analysis. Also, other sources of variation must be considered when interpreting results of fecal glucocorticoid studies.
KW - Corticosterone
KW - Cortisol
KW - Fecal glucocorticoids
KW - Noninvasive
KW - Odocoileus virginianus
KW - Physiology
KW - Sampling protocol
KW - Stress
KW - Variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037508671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00061-3
DO - 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00061-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 12765640
AN - SCOPUS:0037508671
SN - 0016-6480
VL - 132
SP - 21
EP - 26
JO - General and Comparative Endocrinology
JF - General and Comparative Endocrinology
IS - 1
ER -